Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on April 21, 2009

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msp078
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/7/1663    most recent
msp078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigue, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lartillot, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigue, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lartillot, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Computational methods for evaluating phylogenetic models of coding sequence evolution with dependence between codons

Nicolas Rodrigue*,1, Claudia L. Kleinman2, Hervé Philippe2 and Nicolas Lartillot2

1. Department of Biology, Center for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
2. Département de Biochimie, Centre Robert Cedergren, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6821, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec CANADA, H3C 3J7

* Corresponding author nicolas.rodrigue{at}uottawa.ca, tel: 1.613.562.5800 ext. 6341, fax: 1.613.562.5486

Received for publication January 29, 2009. Revision received April 10, 2009. Accepted for publication April 14, 2009.

In recent years, molecular evolutionary models formulated as site-interdependent Markovian codon substitution processes have been proposed as means of mechanistically accounting for selective features over long-range evolutionary scales. Under such models, site-interdependencies are reflected in the use of a simplified protein tertiary structure representation and predefined statistical potential, which, along with mutational parameters, mediate nonsynonymous rates of substitution; rates of synonymous events are solely mediated by mutational parameters. While theoretically attractive, the models are computationally challenging, and the methods used to manipulate them still do not allow for quantitative model evaluations in a multiple-sequence context. Here, we describe Markov chain Monte Carlo computational methodologies for sampling parameters from their posterior distribution under site-interdependent codon substitution models within a phylogenetic context, and allowing for Bayesian model assessment and ranking. Specifically, the techniques we expound here can form the basis of posterior predictive checking under these models, and can be embedded within thermodynamic integration algorithms for computing Bayes factors. We illustrate the methods using two data sets and find that while current forms of site-interdependent models of codon substitution provide an improved fit, they are outperformed by the extended site-independent versions. Altogether, the methodologies described here should enable a quantified contrasting of alternative ways of modeling structural constraints, or other site-interdependent criteria, and establish if such formulations can match (or supplant) site-independent model extensions.

Key Words: Markov chain Monte Carlo • data augmentation • auxiliary variables • posterior predictive checking • Bayes factors • protein tertiary structure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.