Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on October 28, 2008

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msn243
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/231    most recent
msn243v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bordenstein, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bourtzis, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bordenstein, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bourtzis, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Parasitism and mutualism in Wolbachia: what the phylogenomic trees can and can not say

Seth R. Bordenstein1,2,*, Charalampos Paraskevopoulos3,*, Julie C. Dunning Hotopp4,5, Panagiotis Sapountzis3, Nathan Lo6,#, Claudio Bandi7, Hervé Tettelin4,5, John H. Werren8 and Kostas Bourtzis3

1 Josephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
3 Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Ioannina, Agrinio 30100, Greece
4 J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD 20850
5 Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
6 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
7 Dipartimento di Patologia Animale, Igiene e Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria, Università di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy
8 Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Address correspondence to s.bordenstein{at}vanderbilt.edu or kbourtz{at}uoi.gr

Received for publication July 30, 2008. Revision received October 17, 2008. Accepted for publication October 22, 2008.

Ecological and evolutionary theories predict that parasitism and mutualism are not fixed endpoints of the symbiotic spectrum. Rather, parasitism and mutualism may be host or environment dependent, induced by the same genetic machinery, and shifted due to selection. These models presume the existence of genetic or environmental variation that can spur incipient changes in symbiotic lifestyle. However, for obligate intracellular bacteria whose genomes are highly reduced, studies specify that discrete symbiotic associations can be evolutionarily stable for hundreds of millions of years. Wolbachia is an inherited obligate, intracellular infection of invertebrates containing taxa that act broadly as both parasites in arthropods, and mutualists in certain roundworms. Here, we analyze the ancestry of mutualism and parasitism in Wolbachia and the evolutionary trajectory of this variation in symbiotic lifestyle with a comprehensive, phylogenomic analysis. Contrary to previous claims, we show unequivocally that the transition in lifestyle cannot be reconstructed with current methods due to long branch attraction artifacts of the distant Anaplasma and Ehrlichia outgroups. Despite the use of (i) site-heterogeneous phylogenomic methods that can overcome systematic error, (ii) a taxonomically rich set of taxa, and (iii) statistical assessments of the genes, tree topologies, and models of evolution, we conclude that the long-branch attraction artifact is serious enough to afflict past and recent claims including the root lies in the middle of the Wolbachia mutualists and parasites. We show that different inference methods yield different results and high bootstrap support did not equal phylogenetic accuracy. Recombination was rare among this taxonomically-diverse dataset, indicating that elevated levels of recombination in Wolbachia are restricted to specific coinfecting groups. In conclusion, we attribute the inability to root the tree to rate heterogeneity between the ingroup and outgroup. Site-heterogeneous models of evolution did improve the placement of aberrant taxa in the ingroup phylogeny. Finally, in the unrooted topology, the distribution of parasitism and mutualism across the tree suggests at least two interphylum transfers shaped the origins of nematode mutualism and arthropod parasitism. We suggest that the ancestry of mutualism and parasitism is not resolvable without more suitable outgroups or complete genome sequences from all Wolbachia supergroups.

Key Words: endosymbiosis • phylogenomics • parasitism • mutualism • Wolbachia • PhyloBayes


# Present address: The Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
J. L. Koop, D. W. Zeh, M. M. Bonilla, and J. A. Zeh
Reproductive compensation favours male-killing Wolbachia in a live-bearing host
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 4021 - 4028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.