Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on February 14, 2008

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msn046
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/5/972    most recent
msn046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Artieri, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Artieri, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: Evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis

Carlo G. Artieri, Wilfried Haerty, Bhagwati P. Gupta and Rama S. Singh

Dept of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding author: Singh R.S., Telephone number: (905) 525 9140 ext 24378, Fax number: (905) 522 6066, Email address: singh{at}mcmaster.ca

Received for publication November 29, 2007. Revision received February 7, 2008. Accepted for publication February 10, 2008.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the persistence of dioecy despite the reproductive advantages conferred to hermaphrodites, including greater efficiency at purging deleterious mutations in the former. Dioecy can benefit from both mutation purging and accelerated evolution by bringing together beneficial mutations in the same individual via recombination and shuffling of genotypes. In addition, mathematical treatment has shown that sexual selection is also capable of mitigating the cost of maintaining separate sexes by increasing the overall fitness of sexual populations, and genomic comparisons have shown that sexual selection can lead to accelerated evolution. Here we examine the advantages of dioecy vs. hermaphroditism by comparing the rate of evolution in sex related genes and the rate of accumulation of deleterious mutations using a large number of orthologs (11, 493) in the dioecious C. remanei and the hermaphroditic C. briggsae. We have used this dataset to estimate the deleterious mutation rate per generation, U, in both species and find that while it is significantly higher in hermaphrodites, both species are at least two orders of magnitude lower than the value required to explain the persistence of sex by efficiency at purging deleterious mutations alone. We also find that genes expressed in sperm are evolving rapidly in both species; however, they show a greater increase in their rate of evolution relative to genes expressed in other tissues in C. remanei, suggesting stronger sexual selection pressure acting on these genes in dioecious species. Interestingly, the persistence of a signal of rapid evolution of sperm genes in C. briggsae suggests a recent evolutionary origin of hermaphrodism in this lineage. Our results provide empirical evidence of increased sexual selection pressure in dioecious animals, supporting the possibility that sexual selection may play an important role in the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Key Words: Sexual Selection • Deleterious Mutation Rate • Sperm • Caenorhabditis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.