Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on November 13, 2007

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm196
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/12/2687    most recent
msm196v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Patterns of Mutation and Selection at Synonymous Sites in Drosophila

Nadia D. Singh1,*, Vanessa L. Bauer DuMont1, Melissa J. Hubisz2, Rasmus Nielsen3 and Charles F. Aquadro1

1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
2 Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 920 E. 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637
3 Institute of Biology and Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Kbh Ø, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed (Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 233 Biotechnology Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; nds25{at}cornell.edu)

Received for publication May 22, 2007. Revision received August 13, 2007. Accepted for publication September 7, 2007.

That natural selection affects molecular evolution at synonymous sites in protein coding sequences is well established, and is thought to predominantly reflect selection for translational efficiency/accuracy mediated through codon bias. However, a recently developed maximum-likelihood framework, when applied to eighteen coding sequences in three species of Drosophila, confirmed an earlier report that the Notch gene in D. melanogaster was evolving under selection in favor of those codons defined as unpreferred in this species. This finding opened the possibility that synonymous sites may be subject to a variety of selective pressures beyond weak selection for increased frequencies of the codons currently defined as "preferred" in D. melanogaster. To further explore patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila in a lineage-specific manner, we expanded the application of the maximum-likelihood framework to 8452 protein coding sequences with well-defined orthology in D. melanogaster, D. sechellia and D. yakuba. Our analyses reveal intragenomic and interspecific variation in mutational patterns, as well as in patterns and intensity of selection on synonymous sites. In D. melanogaster, our results provide little statistical evidence for recent selection on synonymous sites, and Notch remains an outlier. In contrast, in D. sechellia our findings provide evidence in support of selection predominantly in favor of preferred codons. However, there is a small subset of genes in this species that appear to be evolving under selection in favor of unpreferred codons, which indicates that selection on synonymous sites is not limited to the preferential fixation of mutations that enhance the speed or accuracy of translation in this species.

Key Words: Synonymous site • codon bias • mutational patterns


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.