Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on September 10, 2007

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm188
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/2556    most recent
msm188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leach, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Z. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leach, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Z. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

The Role of Cis-Regulatory Motifs and Genetical Control of Expression in the Divergence of Yeast Duplicate Genes

Lindsey J. Leach1, Ze Zhang1, Chenqi Q. Lu2, Michael J. Kearsey1 and Zewei W. Luo1,2

1 School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
2 Laboratory of Population & Quantitative Genetics, Institute of Biostatistics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Professor Z. W. Luo, School of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, Tel: +44-121-414-5404, Fax: +44-121-414-5925, E-mail: z.luo{at}bham.ac.uk

Received for publication June 17, 2007. Revision received August 24, 2007. Accepted for publication September 5, 2007.

Expression divergence of duplicate genes is widely believed to be important for their retention and evolution of new function, although the mechanism that determines their expression divergence remains unclear. We use a genetical genomics approach to explore divergence in genetical control of yeast duplicate genes created by a whole genome duplication that occurred about 100 million years ago and those with a younger duplication age. The analysis reveals that duplicate genes have a significantly higher probability of sharing common genetic control than pairs of singleton genes. The expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have diverged completely for a high proportion of duplicate pairs, while a substantially larger proportion of duplicates share common regulatory motifs after 100 million years of divergent evolution. The similarity in both genetical control and cis motif structure for a duplicate pair is a reflection of its evolutionary age. This study reveals that up to 20% of variation in expression between ancient duplicate gene pairs in the yeast genome can be explained by both cis motif divergence (~8%) and by trans eQTL divergence (~10%). Initially, divergence in all three aspects of cis motif structure, trans genetical control, and expression evolve co-ordinately with the coding sequence divergence of both young and old duplicate pairs. These findings highlight the importance of divergence in both cis motif structure and trans genetical control in the diverse set of mechanisms underlying the expression divergence of yeast duplicate genes.

Key Words: yeast • duplication • divergence • gene expression • cis motifs • genetic regulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.