Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on March 7, 2007

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm044
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/1113    most recent
msm044v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Article

Assessing the Determinants of Evolutionary Rates in the Presence of Noise

Joshua B. Plotkin*,1 and Hunter B. Fraser{dagger}

* Department of Biology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, PA, USA
{dagger} The Broad Institute of Harvard University and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA

1 Corresponding author, email: jplotkin{at}sas.upenn.edu

Received for publication December 4, 2006. Revision received January 26, 2007. Accepted for publication February 8, 2007.

Although protein sequences are known to evolve at vastly different rates, little is known about what determines their rate of evolution. However, a recent study using principal component regression has concluded that evolutionary rates in yeast are primarily governed by a single determinant, related to translation frequency (Drummond et al. 2006). Here, we demonstrate that noise in biological data can confound principal component regressions, leading to spurious conclusions. When equalizing noise levels across seven predictor variables used in previous studies, we find no evidence that protein evolution is dominated by a single determinant. Our results indicate that a variety of factors – including expression level, gene dispensability, and protein-protein interactions – may independently affect evolutionary rates in yeast. More accurate measurements or more sophisticated statistical techniques will be required to determine which one, if any, of these factors dominates protein evolution.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey
Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.