MBE Advance Access published online on November 13, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl166
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Ludwig-Maximilan Universität, Biocenter, Grosshaderner Str. 2, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried; Center for Study of Evolution, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. In many organisms, selection acts on synonymous codons to improve translation. However the precise basis of this selection remains unclear in the majority of species. Selection could be acting to maximise the speed of elongation, to minimise the costs of proofreading or to maximise the accuracy of translation. Using several datasets, we find evidence that codon use in Escherichia coli is biased to reduce the costs of both mis-sense and non-sense translational errors. Highly conserved sites and genes have higher codon bias than less conserved ones, and codon bias is positively correlated to gene length and production costs, both indicating selection against mis-sense errors. Additionally, codon bias increases along the length of genes, indicating selection against non-sense errors. Doublet mutations or replacement substitutions do not explain our observations. The correlations remain when we control for expression level, and for conflicting selection pressures at the start and end of genes. Considering each amino acid by itself confirms our results. We conclude that selection on synonymous codon use in E. coli is largely due to selection for translational accuracy, to reduce the costs of both mis-sense and of non-sense errors.
Accepted November 2, 2006
Research Article
Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli - Selection for Translational Accuracy
Nina Stoletzki 1 * and Adam Eyre-Walker 2
2 Center for Study of Evolution, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK; National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham NC 27707, USA
Nina Stoletzki, E-mail: nstoletzki{at}googlemail.com
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Y. Waldman, T. Tuller, R. Sharan, and E. Ruppin TP53 Cancerous Mutations Exhibit Selection for Translation Efficiency Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 69(22): 8807 - 8813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, E. V. Koonin, D. J. Lipman, and T. M. Przytycka Selection for minimization of translational frameshifting errors as a factor in the evolution of codon usage Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2009; 37(20): 6799 - 6810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Zhou, M. Weems, and C. O. Wilke Translationally Optimal Codons Associate with Structurally Sensitive Sites in Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1571 - 1580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kudla, A. W. Murray, D. Tollervey, and J. B. Plotkin Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli Science, April 10, 2009; 324(5924): 255 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Massey The Proteomic Constraint and Its Role in Molecular Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2008; 25(12): 2557 - 2565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Higgs and W. Ran Coevolution of Codon Usage and tRNA Genes Leads to Alternative Stable States of Biased Codon Usage Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2279 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jia and P. G. Higgs Codon Usage in Mitochondrial Genomes: Distinguishing Context-Dependent Mutation from Translational Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 339 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



