MBE Advance Access published online on August 21, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl094
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14850, U.S.A.; Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627, U.S.A.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. I present data on the evolution of intron lengths among three closely related Drosophila species, D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. yakuba. Using D. yakuba as an outgroup, I mapped insertion and deletion mutations in 148 introns (spanning
Accepted August 14, 2006
Research Article
Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila
Daven C. Presgraves 1 *
Daven C. Presgraves, E-mail: dvnp{at}mail.rochester.edu
![]()
Abstract
30 kb) to the D. melanogaster and D. simulans lineages. Intron length evolution in the two sister species has been different: in D. melanogaster, X-linked introns have increased slightly in size while autosomal ones have decreased slightly in size; in D. simulans, both X-linked and autosomal introns have decreased in size. To understand the possible evolutionary causes of these lineage and chromosome-specific patterns of intron evolution, I studied indel polymorphism and divergence in D. melanogaster. Small insertion mutations segregate at elevated frequencies and enjoy elevated probabilities of fixation, particularly on the X chromosome. In contrast, there is no detectable X chromosome effect on fixations in D. simulans. These findings suggest X chromosome-specific selection or biased gene conversion-gap repair favoring insertions in D. melanogaster but not in D. simulans. These chromosome- and lineage-specific patterns of indel substitution are not easily explained by existing general population genetic models of intron length evolution. Genomic data from D. melanogaster further suggest that the forces described here affect introns and intergenic regions similarly.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
