Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on June 5, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl029
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/1670    most recent
msl029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heizer, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krane, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heizer, E. M., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Krane, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted May 25, 2006

Research Article

Amino Acid Cost and Codon Usage Biases in Six Prokaryotic Genomes: A Whole Genome Analysis

Esley M. Heizer Jr. 1, Douglas W. Raiford 2, Michael L. Raymer 2, Travis E. Doom 2, Robert V. Miller 3, and Dan E. Krane 1 *

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
3 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dan E. Krane, E-mail: Dan.Krane{at}wright.edu


  Abstract

For most prokaryotic organisms, amino acid biosynthesis represents a significant portion of their overall energy budget. The difference in the cost of synthesis between amino acids can be striking, differing by as much as seven-fold. Two prokaryotic organisms, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, have been shown to preferentially utilize less costly amino acids in highly expressed genes, indicating that parsimony in amino acid selection may confer a selective advantage for prokaryotes. This study confirms those findings and extends them to four additional prokaryotic organisms: Chlamydia trachomatis; Chlamydophila pneumoniae AR39; Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803; and Thermus thermophilus HB27. Adherence to codon usage biases for each of these six organisms is inversely correlated with a coding region's average amino acid biosynthetic cost in a fashion that is independent of chemoheterophic, photoautotrophic, or thermophilic life style. The obligate parasites C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae AR39 are incapable of synthesizing many of the 20 common amino acids. Removing auxotrophic amino acids from consideration in these organisms does not alter the overall trend of preferential use of energetically inexpensive amino acids in highly expressed genes.

Keywords: codon usage bias; amino acid cost; prokaryote; genome; bioinformatics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J. G Bragg and A. Wagner
Protein carbon content evolves in response to carbon availability and may influence the fate of duplicated genes
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1063 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.