MBE Advance Access published online on June 5, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl021
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Harvard Society of Fellows and Bauer Center for Genomics Research, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. We recently introduced a novel method for estimating selection pressures on proteins, termed "volatility," which requires only a single genome sequence. Some criticisms that have been levied against this approach are valid, but many others are based on misconceptions of volatility, or they apply equally to comparative methods of estimating selection. Here, we introduce a simple regression technique for estimating selection pressures on all proteins in a genome, on the basis of limited comparative data. The regression technique does not depend on an underlying population-genetic mechanism. This new approach to estimating selection across a genome should be more powerful and more widely applicable than volatility itself.
Accepted April 28, 2006
Letter
Estimating Selection Pressures from Limited Comparative Data
Joshua B. Plotkin 1 *,
Jonathan Dushoff 2,
Michael M. Desai 3,
and
Hunter B. Fraser 4
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, USA
3 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Dept of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, USA
4 Broad Institute of Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Joshua B. Plotkin, E-mail: jplotkin{at}fas.harvard.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
