MBE Advance Access published online on May 26, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853 USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. In sexually reproducing organisms, male ejaculates are complex traits that are potentially subject to many different selection pressures. Recent experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that post-mating sexual selection, and particularly sexual conflict, may play a key role in the evolution of the proteinaceous components of ejaculates. However, this evidence is based almost entirely on the study of Drosophila, a species with a mating system characterized by a high cost of mating for females. In this paper we broaden our understanding of the role of selection on the evolution of seminal proteins by characterizing these proteins in field crickets, a group of insects in which females appear to benefit from mating multiply. We have used an experimental protocol that can be applied to other organisms for which complete genome sequences are not yet available. By combining an evolutionary EST screen of the male accessory gland in two focal species (Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus) with a bioinformatics approach, we have been able to identify as many as 30 seminal proteins. Evolutionary analyses among five species of the genus Gryllus suggest that seminal protein genes evolve more rapidly than genes encoding proteins that are not involved with reproduction. The rates of synonymous substitution (dS) are similar in genes encoding seminal proteins and genes encoding "housekeeping" proteins. For the same comparison, the rate of fixation of non-synonymous substitutions (dN) is three times higher in genes encoding seminal proteins, suggesting that the divergence of seminal proteins in field crickets has been accelerated by positive Darwinian selection. In spite of the contrasting characteristics of the Drosophila and Gryllus mating systems, the mean selection parameter
Accepted May 16, 2006
Research Article
Molecular Evolution of Seminal Proteins in Field Crickets
José A. Andrés 1 *,
Luana S. Maroja 1,
Steven M. Bogdanowicz 1,
Willie J. Swanson 2,
and
Richard G. Harrison 1
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853 USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. Seattle. WA. 98195. USA
José A. Andrés, E-mail: jaa53{at}cornell.edu
![]()
Abstract
and the proportion of loci estimated to be affected by positive selection are very similar.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Wolfner Battle and Ballet: Molecular Interactions between the Sexes in Drosophila J. Hered., July 1, 2009; 100(4): 399 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Eberhard Colloquium Papers: Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(Supplement_1): 10025 - 10032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miyake, N. Takebayashi, and D. E. Wolf Possible Diversifying Selection in the Imprinted Gene, MEDEA, in Arabidopsis Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2009; 26(4): 843 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ramm, L. McDonald, J. L. Hurst, R. J. Beynon, and P. Stockley Comparative Proteomics Reveals Evidence for Evolutionary Diversification of Rodent Seminal Fluid and Its Functional Significance in Sperm Competition Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 189 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Andres, L. S Maroja, and R. G Harrison Searching for candidate speciation genes using a proteomic approach: seminal proteins in field crickets Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2008; 275(1646): 1975 - 1983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Turner, E. B. Chuong, and H. E. Hoekstra Comparative Analysis of Testis Protein Evolution in Rodents Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2075 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wong, M. C. Turchin, M. F. Wolfner, and C. F. Aquadro Evidence for Positive Selection on Drosophila melanogaster Seminal Fluid Protease Homologs Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 497 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Dean, J. M. Good, and M. W. Nachman Adaptive Evolution of Proteins Secreted during Sperm Maturation: An Analysis of the Mouse Epididymal Transcriptome Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ramm, P. L. Oliver, C. P. Ponting, P. Stockley, and R. D. Emes Sexual Selection and the Adaptive Evolution of Mammalian Ejaculate Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dottorini, L. Nicolaides, H. Ranson, D. W. Rogers, A. Crisanti, and F. Catteruccia A genome-wide analysis in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes reveals 46 male accessory gland genes, possible modulators of female behavior PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16215 - 16220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ravi Ram and M. F. Wolfner Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between males and females during reproduction Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 47(3): 427 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





