MBE Advance Access published online on May 23, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msl017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Smurfit Institute of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. We examined the gene structure of a set of 2563 Arabidopsis thaliana paralogous pairs that were duplicated simultaneously 20-60 million years ago by tetraploidy. Out of a total of 23,164 introns in these genes we found that 10,004 pairs have been conserved, and 578 introns have been inserted or deleted in the time since the duplication event. This intron insertion/deletion rate of 2.7x10-3 - 9.1x10-4 per site per million years is high in comparison to previous studies. At least 56 introns were gained and 39 lost based on parsimony analysis of the phylogenetic distribution of these introns. We found weak evidence that genes undergoing intron gain and loss are biased with respect to gene ontology terms. Gene pairs that experienced at least two intron insertions or deletions show evidence of enrichment for membrane location and transport and transporter activity function. We do not find any relationship of intron flux to expression level or G+C content of the gene. Detection of a bias in the location of intron gains and losses within a gene depends on the method of measurement: an intragene method indicates that events (specifically intron losses) are biased towards the 3 end of the gene. Despite the relatively recent acquisition of these introns, we found only one case where we could identify the mechanism of intron origin - the TOUCH3 gene has experienced two tandem, partial, internal gene duplications which duplicated a pre-existing intron and also created a novel, alternatively-spliced intron which makes use of a duplicated pair of cryptic splice sites.
Accepted May 16, 2006
Research Article
High Rate of Recent Intron Gain and Loss in Simultaneously Duplicated Arabidopsis genes
David G. Knowles 1
and
Aoife McLysaght 1 *
Aoife McLysaght, E-mail: aoife.mclysaght{at}tcd.ie
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Xie, X. Li, B. J. Glover, S. Bai, G.-Y. Rao, J. Luo, and J. Yang Duplication and Functional Diversification of HAP3 Genes Leading to the Origin of the Seed-Developmental Regulatory Gene, LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), in Nonseed Plant Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1581 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tarrio, F. J. Ayala, and F. Rodriguez-Trelles From the Cover: Alternative splicing: A missing piece in the puzzle of intron gain PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7223 - 7228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Carmel, Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1034 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny A Very High Fraction of Unique Intron Positions in the Intron-Rich Diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana Indicates Widespread Intron Gain Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 1447 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny Patterns of Intron Loss and Gain in Plants: Intron Loss-Dominated Evolution and Genome-Wide Comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy, M. Irimia, and D. Penny Very Little Intron Gain in Entamoeba histolytica Genes Laterally Transferred from Prokaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1824 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


