Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on September 14, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msj020
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/121    most recent
msj020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crow, K. D
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crow, K. D
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Accepted August 30, 2005

Research Article

The "Fish Specific" Hox Cluster Duplication is Coincident with the Origin of Teleosts

Karen D Crow 1*, Peter F. Stadler 2, Vincent J. Lynch 1, Chris Amemiya 3, and Günter P. Wagner 1

1 Yale University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511
2 Bioinformatik, Institut für Informatik, Universität Leipzig, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
3 Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, 1201 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-2795

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Karen D Crow, E-mail: karen.crow{at}yale.edu


  Abstract

The Hox gene complement of zebrafish, medaka, and fugu differs from that of other gnathostome vertebrates. These fishes have seven to eight Hox clusters compared to the four Hox clusters described in sarcopterygians and shark. The clusters in different teleost lineages are orthologous, implying that a "fish specific" Hox cluster duplication has occurred in the stem lineage leading to the most recent common ancestor of zebrafish and fugu. The timing of this event, however, is unknown. To address this question, we sequenced four Hox genes from taxa representing basal actinopterygian and teleost lineages, and compared them to known sequences from shark, coelacanth, zebrafish and other teleosts. The resulting gene genealogies suggest that the "fish specific" Hox cluster duplication occurred coincident with the origin of crown group teleosts. In addition, we obtained evidence for an independent Hox cluster duplication in the sturgeon lineage (Acipenseriformes). Finally, results from HoxA11 suggest that duplicated Hox genes have experienced diversifying selection immediately after the duplication event. Taken together, these results support the notion that the duplicated Hox genes of teleosts were causally relevant to adaptive evolution during the initial teleost radiation.

Keywords: Hox cluster; genome duplication; ray-finned fishes; Darwinian selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. N. Rohmann, D. L. Deitcher, and A. H. Bass
Calcium-Activated Potassium (BK) Channels Are Encoded by Duplicate slo1 Genes in Teleost Fishes
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1509 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Kuraku, A. Meyer, and S. Kuratani
Timing of Genome Duplications Relative to the Origin of the Vertebrates: Did Cyclostomes Diverge before or after?
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 47 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. H. Zakon, D. J. Zwickl, Y. Lu, and D. M. Hillis
Molecular evolution of communication signals in electric fish
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1814 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
D. Duboule
The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters
Development, July 15, 2007; 134(14): 2549 - 2560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Semon and K. H. Wolfe
Rearrangement Rate following the Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleosts
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 860 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
I. A Hurley, R. L. Mueller, K. A Dunn, E. J Schmidt, M. Friedman, R. K Ho, V. E Prince, Z. Yang, M. G Thomas, and M. I Coates
A new time-scale for ray-finned fish evolution
Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2007; 274(1609): 489 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
F. G. Brunet, H. R. Crollius, M. Paris, J.-M. Aury, P. Gibert, O. Jaillon, V. Laudet, and M. Robinson-Rechavi
Gene Loss and Evolutionary Rates Following Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleost Fishes
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1808 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. F. Mulley, C.-h. Chiu, and P. W. H. Holland
Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts
PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10369 - 10372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
I. Braasch, W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer
Asymmetric Evolution in Two Fish-Specifically Duplicated Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Paralogons Involved in Teleost Coloration
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1192 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.