MBE Advance Access published online on August 24, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msi242
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 328 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Charles Darwin proposed that evolution occurs primarily by natural selection, but this view has been controversial from the beginning. Two of the major opposing views have been mutationism and neutralism. Early molecular studies suggested that most amino acid substitutions in proteins are neutral or nearly neutral and the functional change of proteins occurs by a few key amino acid substitutions. This suggestion generated an intense controversy over selectionism and neutralism. This controversy is partially caused by Kimura's definition of neutrality, which was too strict (|2Ns|
Accepted August 15, 2005
Review
Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution
Masatoshi Nei, E-mail: nxm2{at}psu.edu
Abstract 
1). If we define neutral mutations as the mutations that do not change the function of gene products appreciably, many controversies disappear because slightly deleterious and slightly advantageous mutations are engulfed by neutral mutations. The ratio of the rate of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution to that of synonymous substitution is a useful quantity to study positive Darwinian selection operating at highly variable genetic loci, but it does not necessarily detect adaptively important codons. Previously, multigene families were thought to evolve following the model of concerted evolution, but new evidence indicates that most of them evolve by a birth-and-death process of duplicate genes. It is now clear that most phenotypic characters or genetic systems such as the adaptive immune system in vertebrates are controlled by the interaction of a number of multigene families, which are often evolutionarily related and are subject to birth-and-death evolution. Therefore, it is important to study the mechanisms of gene family interaction for understanding phenotypic evolution. Since gene duplication occurs more or less at random, phenotypic evolution contains some fortuitous elements, though the environmental factors also play an important role. The randomness of phenotypic evolution is qualitatively different from allele frequency changes by random genetic drift. However, there is some similarity between phenotypic and molecular evolution with respect to functional or environmental constraints and evolutionary rate. It appears that mutation (including gene duplication and other DNA changes) is the driving force of evolution at both the genic and the phenotypic levels.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Carmel and E. V. Koonin A Universal Nonmonotonic Relationship between Gene Compactness and Expression Levels in Multicellular Eukaryotes Gen Biol Evol, October 20, 2009; 2009(0): 382 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Shan, L. Zahn, S. Guindon, P. K. Wall, H. Kong, H. Ma, C. W. dePamphilis, and J. Leebens-Mack Evolution of Plant MADS Box Transcription Factors: Evidence for Shifts in Selection Associated with Early Angiosperm Diversification and Concerted Gene Duplications Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2009; 26(10): 2229 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Bloom and F. H. Arnold Colloquium Papers: In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(Supplement_1): 9995 - 10000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Axelsson and H. Ellegren Quantification of Adaptive Evolution of Genes Expressed in Avian Brain and the Population Size Effect on the Efficacy of Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2009; 26(5): 1073 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nozawa, Y. Suzuki, and M. Nei Reliabilities of identifying positive selection by the branch-site and the site-prediction methods PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6700 - 6705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Albu, X. J. Min, D. Hickey, and B. Golding Uncorrected Nucleotide Bias in mtDNA Can Mimic the Effects of Positive Darwinian Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2008; 25(12): 2521 - 2524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Juarez, I. Comas, F. Gonzalez-Candelas, and J. J. Calvete Evolution of Snake Venom Disintegrins by Positive Darwinian Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2391 - 2407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Jiang, W. Guan, D. Pinney, W. Wang, and Z. Gu Relaxation of yeast mitochondrial functions after whole-genome duplication Genome Res., September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1466 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Kosakovsky Pond, A. F.Y. Poon, A. J. Leigh Brown, and S. D.W. Frost A Maximum Likelihood Method for Detecting Directional Evolution in Protein Sequences and Its Application to Influenza A Virus Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1809 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rokas and S. B. Carroll Frequent and Widespread Parallel Evolution of Protein Sequences Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1943 - 1953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Zhao and R. J. Epstein Programmed Genetic Instability: A Tumor-Permissive Mechanism for Maintaining the Evolvability of Higher Species through Methylation-Dependent Mutation of DNA Repair Genes in the Male Germ Line Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1737 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Alonso, S. Lopez, N. Izagirre, and C. de la Rua Overdominance in the Human Genome and Olfactory Receptor Activity Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 997 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Houzelstein, I. R. Goncalves, A. Orth, F. Bonhomme, and P. Netter Lgals6, a 2-Million-Year-Old Gene in Mice: A Case of Positive Darwinian Selection and Presence/Absence Polymorphism Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1533 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Matsuo Rapid Evolution of Two Odorant-Binding Protein Genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 1061 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. I. Nikolaev, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, K. Popadin, L. Parand, E. H. Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, and S. E. Antonarakis Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20443 - 20448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Hallatschek, P. Hersen, S. Ramanathan, and D. R. Nelson Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 19926 - 19930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nei The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12235 - 12242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lynch Colloquium Papers: The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(suppl_1): 8597 - 8604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Takahata Molecular Clock: An Anti-neo-Darwinian Legacy Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 1 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Sawyer, J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and D. L. Hartl Inaugural Article: Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6504 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Mustonen and M. Lassig Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2277 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Freeling and B. C. Thomas Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 805 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker The Rate of Adaptive Evolution in Enteric Bacteria Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1348 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|