MBE Advance Access published online on July 13, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msi212
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 46469-2320, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Heterotachy occurs when the relative evolutionary rates among sites are not the same across lineages. Sequence alignments are likely to exhibit heterotachy with varying severity because the intensity of purifying selection and adaptive forces at a given amino acid or DNA sequence position are unlikely to be the same in different species. In a recent study the influence of heterotachy on the performance of different phylogenetic methods was examined using computer simulation for a four-species phylogeny. Maximum parsimony (MP) was reported to generally outperform maximum likelihood (ML). However, our comparisons of MP and ML methods using the methods and evaluation criteria employed in that study, but considering the possible range of proportions of sites involved in heterotachy, contradict their findings and indicate that in fact, ML is significantly superior to MP even under heterotachy.
Accepted July 4, 2005
Letter
Maximum Likelihood Outperforms Maximum Parsimony even when Evolutionary Rates are Heterotachous
2 Center for Evolutionary Functional Genomics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, 85287-5301 USA; The School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, 85287-5301 USA
Sudhindra R Gadagkar, E-mail: gadagkar{at}notes.udayton.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Wurdack and C. C. Davis Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1551 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, M. J. Moore, P. S. Soltis, C. D. Bell, S. F. Brockington, R. Alexandre, C. C. Davis, M. Latvis, S. R. Manchester, and D. E. Soltis Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests PNAS, March 10, 2009; 106(10): 3853 - 3858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kim and M. J. Sanderson Penalized Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference: Bridging the Parsimony-Likelihood Gap Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 665 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Clark, R. H. Ree, M. E. Alfaro, M. G. King, W. L. Wagner, and E. H. Roalson A Comparative Study in Ancestral Range Reconstruction Methods: Retracing the Uncertain Histories of Insular Lineages Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 693 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kolaczkowski and J. W. Thornton A Mixed Branch Length Model of Heterotachy Improves Phylogenetic Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1054 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Matsen and M. Steel Phylogenetic Mixtures on a Single Tree Can Mimic a Tree of Another Topology Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 767 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar and A. Filipski Multiple sequence alignment: In pursuit of homologous DNA positions Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Spencer, D. Bryant, and E. Susko Conditioned Genome Reconstruction: How to Avoid Choosing the Conditioning Genome Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 25 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ruano-Rubio and M. A. Fares Artifactual Phylogenies Caused by Correlated Distribution of Substitution Rates among Sites and Lineages: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 68 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




