Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on February 2, 2005

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msi098
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1119    most recent
msi098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponger, L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ponger, L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005; all rights reserved.
Accepted January 25, 2005

Research Article

Evolutionary Diversification of DNA Methyltransferases in Eukaryotic Genomes

Loïc Ponger * and Wen-Hsiung Li

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Loïc Ponger, E-mail: ponger{at}uchicago.edu


   Abstract

In eukaryotes, C5-cytosine methylation is a common mechanism associated with a variety of functions such as gene regulation or control of genomic stability. Different subfamilies of eukaryotic methyltransferases (MTases) have been identified, mainly in metazoa, plants, and fungi. In this paper, we used hidden Markov models to detect MTases in completed or almost completed eukaryotic genomes, including different species of Protozoa. A phylogenetic analysis of MTases enabled us to define 6 subfamilies of MTases, including two new subfamilies. The dnmt1 subfamily that includes all the known MTases with a maintenance activity seems to be absent in the protozoa. The dnmt2 subfamily seems to be the most widespread, being present even in the non-methylated Dictyostelium discoideum. We also found two dnmt2 members in the bacterial genus Geobacter, suggesting that horizontal transfers of MTases occurred in eukaryotes as well as in prokaryotes. Even if the direction of transfer cannot be determined, this relationship might be useful for understanding the function of this enigmatic subfamily of MTase. Globally, our analysis reveals a great diversity of MTases in eukaryotes, suggesting the existence of different methylation systems. Our results also suggest acquisitions and losses of different MTases in every eukaryotic lineage studied and that some eukaryotes appear to be devoid of methylation.

Keywords: DNA methylation; DNA methyltransferases; Eukaryotes; Repeat-Induced Point mutation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Diaz-Castillo and K. G. Golic
Evolution of Gene Sequence in Response to Chromosomal Location
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 359 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. Katoh, T. Curk, Q. Xu, B. Zupan, A. Kuspa, and G. Shaulsky
Developmentally Regulated DNA Methylation in Dictyostelium discoideum
Eukaryot. Cell, January 1, 2006; 5(1): 18 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kuhlmann, B. E. Borisova, M. Kaller, P. Larsson, D. Stach, J. Na, L. Eichinger, F. Lyko, V. Ambros, F. Soderbom, et al.
Silencing of retrotransposons in Dictyostelium by DNA methylation and RNAi
Nucleic Acids Res., November 10, 2005; 33(19): 6405 - 6417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.