MBE Advance Access published online on November 3, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msi032
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Departments of Botany and of Statistics, University of Wisconsin--Madison
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Genome arrangements are a potentially powerful source of information to infer evolutionary relationships among distantly related taxa. Mitochondrial genome arrangements may be especially informative about metazoan evolutionary relationships because (1) nearly all animals have the same set of definitively homologous mitochondrial genes, (2) mitochondrial genome rearrangement events are rare relative to changes in sequences, and (3) the number of possible mitochondrial genome arrangements is huge, making convergent evolution of genome arrangements appear highly unlikely. In previous studies, phylogenetic evidence in genome arrangement data is nearly always used in a qualitative fashion -- the support in favor of clades with similar or identical genome arrangements is considered to be quite strong, but is not quantified. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the uncertainty among the relationships of metazoan phyla on the basis of mitochondrial genome arrangements while incorporating prior knowledge of the monophyly of various groups from other sources. The work we present here differs from our previous work in the statistics literature in that: (1) we incorporate prior information on classifications of metazoans at the phylum level, (2) we describe several advances in our computational approach, and (3) we analyze a much larger data set (87 taxa) that consists of each unique, complete mitochondrial genome arrangement with a full complement of 37 genes that were present in the NCBI data base at a recent date. In addition, we analyze a subset of 28 of these 87 taxa for which the non-tRNA mitochondrial genomes are unique where the assumption of our inversion-only model of rearrangement is more plausible. We present summaries of Bayesian posterior distributions of tree topology on the basis of these two data sets.
Research Article
A Bayesian Analysis of Metazoan Mitochondrial Genome Arrangements
2 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Duquesne University
3 Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
4 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maryland--College Park
Bret Larget, E-mail: larget{at}stat.wisc.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Miklos and A. E. Darling Efficient Sampling of Parsimonious Inversion Histories with Application to Genome Rearrangement in Yersinia Gen Biol Evol, July 14, 2009; 2009(0): 153 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao and G. Bourque Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 934 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Esteban-Marcos, A. E. Darling, and M. A. Ragan Seevolution: visualizing chromosome evolution Bioinformatics, April 1, 2009; 25(7): 960 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Dellaporta, A. Xu, S. Sagasser, W. Jakob, M. A. Moreno, L. W. Buss, and B. Schierwater Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerens supports Placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8751 - 8756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ronquist, B. Larget, J. P. Huelsenbeck, J. B. Kadane, D. Simon, and P. van der Mark Comment on "Phylogenetic MCMC Algorithms Are Misleading on Mixtures of Trees" Science, April 21, 2006; 312(5772): 367a - 367a. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. San Mauro, D. J. Gower, R. Zardoya, and M. Wilkinson A Hotspot of Gene Order Rearrangement by Tandem Duplication and Random Loss in the Vertebrate Mitochondrial Genome Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 227 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





