Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on October 20, 2004

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msi019
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/317    most recent
msi019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Löhne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Borsch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Löhne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Borsch, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted October 4, 2004

Research Article

Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Utility of the petD Group II Intron: a Case Study in Basal Angiosperms

Cornelia Löhne 1* and Thomas Borsch 1

1 Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cornelia Löhne, E-mail: c.loehne{at}uni-bonn.de


   Abstract

Sequences of spacers and group I introns in plant chloroplast genomes have recently been shown to be very effective in phylogenetic reconstruction at higher taxonomic levels and not only for inferring relationships among species. Group II introns, being more frequent in those genomes than group I introns, may be further promising markers. Because group II introns are structurally constrained, we assumed that sequences of a group II intron should be alignable across seed plants. We designed universal amplification primers for the petD intron and sequenced this intron in a representative selection of 47 angiosperms and gymnosperms. Our sampling of taxa is the most representative of major seed plant lineages to date for group II introns. Through differential analysis of structural partitions we studied patterns of molecular evolution and their contribution to phylogenetic signal. Non-pairing stretches (loops, bulges, interhelical nucleotides) were considerably more variable in both substitutions and indels than helical elements. Differences among the domains are basically a function of their structural composition. After the exclusion of two mutational hotspots accounting for <18 % of sequence length, which are located in loops of domains I and IV, all sequences could be aligned unambiguously across seed plants. Microstructural changes predominantly occurred in loop regions and are mostly simple sequence repeats. An indel matrix comprising 241 characters revealed microstructural changes to be of lower homoplasy than substitutions. In showing Amborella first branching and providing support for a magnoliid clade through a synapomorphic indel, the petD dataset proved effective in testing between alternative hypotheses on the basal nodes of the angiosperm tree. Within angiosperms, group II introns offer phylogenetic signal that is intermediate in information content between that of spacers and group I introns on the one hand, and coding sequences on the other.

Keywords: chloroplast noncoding DNA; group II intron; petD; phylogeny; microstructural changes; basal angiosperms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. A. Morrison
Why Would Phylogeneticists Ignore Computerized Sequence Alignment?
Syst Biol, March 25, 2009; (2009) syp009v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. L. Taylor, B. L. Gutman, N. A. Melrose, A. M. Ingraham, J. A. Schwartz, and J. M. Osborn
Pollen and anther ontogeny in Cabomba caroliniana (Cabombaceae, Nymphaeales)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2008; 95(4): 399 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. W. Taylor, G. J. Brenner, and S. H. Basha
Scutifolium jordanicum gen. et sp. nov. (Cabombaceae), an aquatic fossil plant from the Lower Cretaceous of Jordan, and the relationships of related leaf fossils to living genera
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 340 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. F. Sage, T. L. Sage, R. W. Pearcy, and T. Borsch
The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis in Amaranthaceae sensu stricto
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2007; 94(12): 1992 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. Benavides, R. Baum, D. McClellan, and J. W. Sites
Molecular Phylogenetics of the Lizard Genus Microlophus (Squamata:Tropiduridae): Aligning and Retrieving Indel Signal from Nuclear Introns
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 776 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. A. Koch, C. Dobes, C. Kiefer, R. Schmickl, L. Klimes, and M. A. Lysak
Supernetwork Identifies Multiple Events of Plastid trnF(GAA) Pseudogene Evolution in the Brassicaceae
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 63 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. Hausner, R. Olson, D. Simon, I. Johnson, E. R. Sanders, K. G. Karol, R. M. McCourt, and S. Zimmerly
Origin and Evolution of the Chloroplast trnK (matK) Intron: A Model for Evolution of Group II Intron RNA Structures
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 380 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
T. Cieslak, J. S. Polepalli, A. White, K. Muller, T. Borsch, W. Barthlott, J. Steiger, A. Marchant, and L. Legendre
Phylogenetic analysis of Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae): chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology support several geographically distinct radiations
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2005; 92(10): 1723 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.