MBE Advance Access published online on May 12, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msh156
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: djtaylor{at}buffalo.edu.
Despite the importance of molecular phylogenetics, few of its assumptions have been tested with real data. It is commonly assumed that nonparametric bootstrap values are an underestimate of the actual support, Bayesian posterior probabilities are an overestimate of the actual support, and among-gene phylogenetic conflict is low. We directly tested these assumptions using a well-supported yeast reference tree. We found that bootstrap values were not significantly different from accuracy. Bayesian support values were, however, significant overestimates of accuracy, but still had low false positive error rates (0-2.8%) at the highest values (>99%). Although we found evidence for a branch length bias contributing to conflict, there was little evidence for widespread, strongly supported among-gene conflict from bootstraps. The results demonstrate that caution is warranted concerning conclusions of conflict based on the assumption of underestimation for support values in real data. Key Words:
Bootstrap, incongruence, Bayesian phylogenetic inference, yeast genome
Letter to the Editor
An Assessment of Accuracy, Error and Conflict with Support Values from Genome-Scale Phylogenetic Data
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Liu, J. W. Leigh, H. Brinkmann, M. T. Cushion, N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, H. Philippe, and B. F. Lang Phylogenomic Analyses Support the Monophyly of Taphrinomycotina, including Schizosaccharomyces Fission Yeasts Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-H. Kuo, J. P. Wares, and J. C. Kissinger The Apicomplexan Whole-Genome Phylogeny: An Analysis of Incongruence among Gene Trees Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2008; 25(12): 2689 - 2698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. A. Scherson, R. Vidal, and M. J. Sanderson Phylogeny, biogeography, and rates of diversification of New World Astragalus (Leguminosae) with an emphasis on South American radiations Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 1030 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. R. Holland, A. C. Clarke, and H. M. Meudt Optimizing Automated AFLP Scoring Parameters to Improve Phylogenetic Resolution Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 347 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Wiens, C. A. Kuczynski, S. A. Smith, D. G. Mulcahy, J. W. Sites Jr., T. M. Townsend, and T. W. Reeder Branch Lengths, Support, and Congruence: Testing the Phylogenomic Approach with 20 Nuclear Loci in Snakes Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 420 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Kolaczkowski and J. W. Thornton Effects of Branch Length Uncertainty on Bayesian Posterior Probabilities for Phylogenetic Hypotheses Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2108 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gatesy, R. DeSalle, and N. Wahlberg How Many Genes Should a Systematist Sample? Conflicting Insights from a Phylogenomic Matrix Characterized by Replicated Incongruence Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 355 - 363. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Kotov, S. Ishida, and D. J. Taylor A new species in the Daphnia curvirostris (Crustacea: Cladocera) complex from the eastern Palearctic with molecular phylogenetic evidence for the independent origin of neckteeth J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2006; 28(11): 1067 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Anisimova and O. Gascuel Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 539 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K Monro The revision of species-rich genera: a phylogenetic framework for the strategic revision of Pilea (Urticaceae) based on cpDNA, nrDNA, and morphology Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2006; 93(3): 426 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ren, H. Tanaka, and Z. Yang An Empirical Examination of the Utility of Codon-Substitution Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction Syst Biol, October 1, 2005; 54(5): 808 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Collins, O. Fedrigo, and G. J. P. Naylor Choosing the Best Genes for the Job: The Case for Stationary Genes in Genome-Scale Phylogenetics Syst Biol, June 1, 2005; 54(3): 493 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Gibson, V. Gowri-Shankar, P. G. Higgs, and M. Rattray A Comprehensive Analysis of Mammalian Mitochondrial Genome Base Composition and Improved Phylogenetic Methods Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 251 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Berlin and H. Ellegren Chicken W: A genetically uniform chromosome in a highly variable genome PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 15967 - 15969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|