Skip Navigation



MBE Advance Access published online on April 14, 2004

Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msh144
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1428    most recent
msh144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeil, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfeil, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted March 23, 2004

Original Articles

Paralogy and Orthology in the Malvaceae rpb2 Gene Family: Investigation of Gene Duplication in Hibiscus

B. E. Pfeil 1*, C. L. Brubaker 2, L. A. Craven 2, M. D. Crisp 3

1 CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Australian National University, School of Botany and Zoology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
2 CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
3 Australian National University, School of Botany and Zoology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bep27{at}cornell.edu.


   Abstract

A sample of the second largest subunit of low-copy nuclear RNA polymerase II (rpb2) sequences from Malvaceae subfamily Malvoideae suggests that rpb2 has been duplicated early in the subfamily's history. Hibiscus and related taxa possess two rpb2 genes, both of which produce congruent phylogenetic patterns that are largely concordant with cpDNA topologies. No evidence of functional divergence or disruption was found amongst duplicated copies, suggesting that long term maintenance of duplicated copies of rpb2 is usual in this lineage. Therefore, this gene may be suitable for the potential diagnosis of relatively old polyploid events. One probable pseudogene was found in Radyera farragei and a single chimeric sequence was recovered from Howittia trilocularis, suggesting that the rpb2 locus is not as prone to evolutionary processes that can confound phylogenetic inferences based on nDNA sequences. The pattern of relationships among rpb2 sequences, coupled with chromosome number information and Southern hybridization data, suggests that an early polyploid event was not the cause of the duplication, despite independent evidence of paleopolyploidy in some members of Malvoideae. Rpb2 exons and introns together are suitable for phylogenetic analysis, producing well-resolved and well-supported results that were robust to model permutation and congruent with previous studies of subfamily Malvoideae using cpDNA characters.

Key Words: gene duplication, RNA polymerase II, Hibiscus, phylogenetics, evolution, low-copy nuclear DNA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Popp and B. Oxelman
Origin and evolution of North American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 330 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. V. Norup, J. Dransfield, M. W. Chase, A. S. Barfod, E. S. Fernando, and W. J. Baker
Homoplasious character combinations and generic delimitation: a case study from the Indo-Pacific arecoid palms (Arecaceae: Areceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2006; 93(7): 1065 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Joly, J. R Starr, W. H Lewis, and A. Bruneau
Polyploid and hybrid evolution in roses east of the Rocky Mountains
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2006; 93(3): 412 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.