MBE Advance Access published online on March 10, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msh120
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arlin.stoltzfus{at}nist.gov.
Theories regarding the evolution of spliceosomal introns differ in the extent to which the distribution of introns reflects either a formative role in the evolution of protein-coding genes, or the adventitious gain of genetic elements. Here, systematic methods are used to assess the causes of the present-day distribution of introns in 10 families of eukaryotic protein-coding genes comprising 1868 introns in 488 distinct alignment positions. The history of intron evolution inferred using a probabilistic model that allows ancestral inheritance of introns, gain of introns, and loss of introns reveals that the vast majority of introns in these eukaryotic gene families were not inherited from the most recent common ancestral genes, but were gained subsequently. Furthermore, among inferred events of intron gain that meet strict criteria of reliability, the distribution of sites of gain with respect to reading-frame phase shows a 5:3:2 ratio of phases 0, 1 and 2 (respectively), and exhibits a nucleotide preference for MAG^GT (positions -3 to +2 relative to the site of gain). The nucleotide preferences of intron gain may prove to be the ultimate cause for the phase bias. The phase bias of intron gain is sufficient to account quantitatively for the well known 5:3:2 bias in phase frequencies among extant introns, a conclusion that holds even when taxonomic heterogeneity in phase patterns is considered. Thus, intron gain accounts for the vast majority of extant introns, and for the bias toward phase 0 introns that previously was interpreted as evidence for ancient formative introns. Key Words:
intron gain, evolution, intron phase, proto-splice site, target site
© 2004 Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved.
Original Articles
The Evolutionary Gain of Spliceosomal Introns: Sequence and Phase Preferences
2 Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA; Dept. Biology, Pomona College, Claremont, CA
3 Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA; Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Mail Stop 8310, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899-8310
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Catania, X. Gao, and D. G. Scofield Endogenous Mechanisms for the Origins of Spliceosomal Introns J. Hered., September 1, 2009; 100(5): 591 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Omilian, D. G. Scofield, and M. Lynch Intron Presence-Absence Polymorphisms in Daphnia Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2008; 25(10): 2129 - 2139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tarrio, F. J. Ayala, and F. Rodriguez-Trelles From the Cover: Alternative splicing: A missing piece in the puzzle of intron gain PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7223 - 7228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pavesi, F. Zambelli, C. Caggese, and G. Pesole Exalign: a new method for comparative analysis of exon-intron gene structures Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2008; 36(8): e47 - e47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Loh, S. Brenner, and B. Venkatesh Investigation of Loss and Gain of Introns in the Compact Genomes of Pufferfishes (Fugu and Tetraodon) Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 526 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Basu, I. B. Rogozin, O. Deusch, T. Dagan, W. Martin, and E. V. Koonin Evolutionary Dynamics of Introns in Plastid-Derived Genes in Plants: Saturation Nearly Reached but Slow Intron Gain Continues Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 111 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. De Kee, V. Gopalan, and A. Stoltzfus A Sequence-Based Model Accounts Largely for the Relationship of Intron Positions to Protein Structural Features Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2158 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Carmel, I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin Evolutionarily conserved genes preferentially accumulate introns Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Carmel, Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1034 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny A Very High Fraction of Unique Intron Positions in the Intron-Rich Diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana Indicates Widespread Intron Gain Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 1447 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Nguyen, M. Yoshihama, and N. Kenmochi The Evolution of Spliceosomal Introns in Alveolates Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1093 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny Patterns of Intron Loss and Gain in Plants: Intron Loss-Dominated Evolution and Genome-Wide Comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny Large-scale intron conservation and order-of-magnitude variation in intron loss/gain rates in apicomplexan evolution Genome Res., October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1270 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy, M. Irimia, and D. Penny Very Little Intron Gain in Entamoeba histolytica Genes Laterally Transferred from Prokaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1824 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Knowles and A. McLysaght High Rate of Recent Intron Gain and Loss in Simultaneously Duplicated Arabidopsis Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1548 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. L. Hartl Very little intron loss/gain in Plasmodium: Intron loss/gain mutation rates and intron number Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 750 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch The Origins of Eukaryotic Gene Structure Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 450 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lin and D.-Y. Zhang The excess of 5' introns in eukaryotic genomes Nucleic Acids Res., November 27, 2005; 33(20): 6522 - 6527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Y. Yampolsky and A. Stoltzfus The Exchangeability of Amino Acids in Proteins Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1459 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-K. Niu, W.-R. Hou, and S.-W. Li mRNA-Mediated Intron Losses: Evidence from Extraordinarily Large Exons Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 1475 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert Rates of intron loss and gain: Implications for early eukaryotic evolution PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5773 - 5778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Sverdlov, I. B. Rogozin, V. N. Babenko, and E. V. Koonin Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution Nucleic Acids Res., March 23, 2005; 33(6): 1741 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vanacova, W. Yan, J. M. Carlton, and P. J. Johnson Spliceosomal introns in the deep-branching eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis PNAS, March 22, 2005; 102(12): 4430 - 4435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert Complex early genes PNAS, February 8, 2005; 102(6): 1986 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert The pattern of intron loss PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 713 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Logsdon Jr. Worm genomes hold the smoking guns of intron gain PNAS, August 3, 2004; 101(31): 11195 - 11196. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coghlan and K. H. Wolfe From the Cover: Origins of recently gained introns in Caenorhabditis PNAS, August 3, 2004; 101(31): 11362 - 11367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





