MBE Advance Access published online on August 29, 2003
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg235
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2003; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: haruh{at}k.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Although most LINEs (long interspersed nuclear elements), which are autonomous non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposons, are inserted throughout the host genome, three groups of LINEs, the early-branched group, the Tx group, and the R1 clade, are inserted into specific sites within the target sequence. We previously characterized the sequence-specificity of the R1 clade elements. In this study, we screened the other two groups of sequence-specific LINEs from public DNA databases, reconstructed elements from fragmented sequences, identified their target sequences, and analyzed them phylogenetically. We characterized 13 elements in the early-branched group, and 13 in the Tx group. In the early-branched group, we identified R2 elements from sea squirts and zebrafish in this study, although R2 has not been characterized outside the arthropod group to date. This is the first evidence of cross-phylum distribution of sequence-specific LINEs. The Dong element also occurs across phyla, among arthropods and mollusks. In the Tx group, we characterized five novel sequence-specific families: Kibi for TC repeats, Koshi for TTC repeats, Keno for the U2 snRNA gene, Dewa for the tRNA tandem arrays, and Mutsu for the 5S rRNA gene. Keno and Mutsu insert into the highly conserved region within small RNA genes and destroy the targets. Several copies of Dewa insert different positions of tRNA tandem array, which indicates a certain site-specifier' other than sequence-specific endonuclease. In all three groups, LINEs specific for the rRNA genes or microsatellites can occur as multiple families in one organism. This indicates that the copy number of a target sequence is the primary factor to restrict the variety of sequence-specificity of LINEs. Key Words:
non-LTR retrotransposons, LINE, sequence-specificity, evolution, target-specific retrotransposition
© 2003 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Original Articles
Cross-Genome Screening of Novel Sequence-Specific Non-LTR Retrotransposons: Various Multicopy RNA Genes and Microsatellites Are Selected as Targets
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Rho and H. Tang MGEScan-non-LTR: computational identification and classification of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in eukaryotic genomes Nucleic Acids Res., September 17, 2009; (2009) gkp752v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Kojima and N. Okada mRNA Retrotransposition Coupled with 5' Inversion as a Possible Source of New Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1405 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Khazina and O. Weichenrieder Non-LTR retrotransposons encode noncanonical RRM domains in their first open reading frame PNAS, January 20, 2009; 106(3): 731 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kordis, N. Lovsin, and F. Gubensek Phylogenomic Analysis of the L1 Retrotransposons in Deuterostomia Syst Biol, December 1, 2006; 55(6): 886 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Kojima, K.-i. Kuma, H. Toh, and H. Fujiwara Identification of rDNA-Specific Non-LTR Retrotransposons in Cnidaria Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1984 - 1993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Averbeck and T. H. Eickbush Monitoring the Mode and Tempo of Concerted Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster rDNA Locus Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1837 - 1846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Christensen, A. Bibillo, and T. H. Eickbush Role of the Bombyx mori R2 element N-terminal domain in the target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) reaction Nucleic Acids Res., November 10, 2005; 33(20): 6461 - 6468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Kojima and H. Fujiwara Long-Term Inheritance of the 28S rDNA-Specific Retrotransposon R2 Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2005; 22(11): 2157 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Kojima and H. Fujiwara An extraordinary retrotransposon family encoding dual endonucleases Genome Res., August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1106 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang and T. H. Eickbush Characterization of Active R2 Retrotransposition in the rDNA Locus of Drosophila simulans Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 195 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-N. Volff, H. Lehrach, R. Reinhardt, and D. Chourrout Retroelement Dynamics and a Novel Type of Chordate Retrovirus-like Element in the Miniature Genome of the Tunicate Oikopleura dioica Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2004; 21(11): 2022 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Maita, T. Anzai, H. Aoyagi, H. Mizuno, and H. Fujiwara Crystal Structure of the Endonuclease Domain Encoded by the Telomere-specific Long Interspersed Nuclear Element, TRAS1 J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 41067 - 41076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






