MBE Advance Access published online on May 30, 2003
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg145
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2003; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology & Health Services, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, Pennsylvania 16444, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: usorhannus{at}edinboro.edu.
Likelihood-based and parsimony-based methods were used to test for potential effects of positive selection on the sexually induced gene 1 (Sig1) in Thalassiosira weissflogii. The Sig-proteins are thought to play a role in mediating sperm-egg recognition during the sexual reproduction phase. The results obtained from parsimony-based analyses showed that none of the amino acid sites were influenced by positive selection. Maximum likelihood analyses indicated that positive selection was affecting a maximum of 7 and a minimum of 4 amino acid sites in the polypeptide derived from Sig1. It was concluded that the results obtained from the likelihood-based method are more reliable than those obtained from the parsimony-based approach. This is apparently the first study that has shown that reproductive proteins in unicellular eukaryotes are influenced by positive selection. Key Words:
Sexual reproduction gene, likelihood, parsimony, positive selection, synonymous substitution, nonsynonymous substitution
© 2003 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Original Articles
The Effect of Positive Selection on a Sexual Reproduction Gene in Thalassiosira weissflogii (Bacillariophyta): Results Obtained from Maximum Likelihood and Parsimony-Based Methods
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Kosakovsky Pond and S. D. W. Frost Not So Different After All: A Comparison of Methods for Detecting Amino Acid Sites Under Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1208 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. W. Wong, Z. Yang, N. Goldman, and R. Nielsen Accuracy and Power of Statistical Methods for Detecting Adaptive Evolution in Protein Coding Sequences and for Identifying Positively Selected Sites Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1041 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang Frequent False Detection of Positive Selection by the Likelihood Method with Branch-Site Models Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1332 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Suzuki and M. Nei False-Positive Selection Identified by ML-Based Methods: Examples from the Sig1 Gene of the Diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax Gene of a Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2004; 21(5): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

