Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (151)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dover, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dover, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 5, 393-414, Copyright © 1988 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster

JM Hancock, D Tautz and GA Dover
Genetics Department, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

This paper examines the effects of DNA sequence evolution on RNA secondary structures and compensatory mutations. Models of the secondary structures of Drosophila melanogaster 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and of the complex between 2S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs have been drawn on the basis of comparative and energetic criteria. The overall AU richness of the D. melanogaster rRNAs allows the resolution of some ambiguities in the structures of both large rRNAs. Comparison of the sequence of expansion segment V2 in D. melanogaster 18S rRNA with the same region in three other Drosophila species and the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) allows us to distinguish between two models for the secondary structure of this region. The secondary structures of the expansion segments of D. melanogaster 28S rRNA conform to a general pattern for all eukaryotes, despite having highly divergent sequences between D. melanogaster and vertebrates. The 70 novel compensatory mutations identified in the 28S rRNA show a strong (70%) bias toward A-U base pairs, suggesting that a process of biased mutation and/or biased fixation of A and T point mutations or AT-rich slippage-generated motifs has occurred during the evolution of D. melanogaster rDNA. This process has not occurred throughout the D. melanogaster genome. The processes by which compensatory pairs of mutations are generated and spread are discussed, and a model is suggested by which a second mutation is more likely to occur in a unit with a first mutation as such a unit begins to spread through the family and concomitantly through the population. Alternatively, mechanisms of proofreading in stem-loop structures at the DNA level, or between RNA and DNA, might be involved. The apparent tolerance of noncompensatory mutations in some stems which are otherwise strongly supported by comparative criteria within D. melanogaster 28S rRNA must be borne in mind when compensatory mutations are used as a criterion in secondary-structure modeling. Noncompensatory mutation may extend to the production of unstable structures where a stem is stabilized by RNA- protein or additional RNA-RNA interactions in the mature ribosome. Of motifs suggested to be involved in rRNA processing, one (CGAAAG) is strongly overrepresented in the 28S rRNA sequence. The data are discussed both in the context of the forces involved with the evolution of multigene families and in the context of molecular coevolution in the rDNA family in particular.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. E. Stage and T. H. Eickbush
Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1888 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
C. Guarraia, L. Norris, A. Raman, and P. J. Farabaugh
Saturation mutagenesis of a +1 programmed frameshift-inducing mRNA sequence derived from a yeast retrotransposon
RNA, November 1, 2007; 13(11): 1940 - 1947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. Zhang, Y. Peng, W. Wang, and B. Su
Rapid evolution of an X-linked microRNA cluster in primates
Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-x. Luan, J. M. Mallatt, R.-d. Xie, Y.-m. Yang, and W.-y. Yin
The Phylogenetic Positions of Three Basal-Hexapod Groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) Based on Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1579 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. J. Gillespie, J. B. Munro, J. M. Heraty, M. J. Yoder, A. K. Owen, and A. E. Carmichael
A Secondary Structural Model of the 28S rRNA Expansion Segments D2 and D3 for Chalcidoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1593 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. J. McTaggart and T. J. Crease
Selection on the Structural Stability of a Ribosomal RNA Expansion Segment in Daphnia obtusa
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1309 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
G. ALKEMAR and O. NYGARD
Secondary structure of two regions in expansion segments ES3 and ES6 with the potential of forming a tertiary interaction in eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunits
RNA, March 1, 2004; 10(3): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. D. Burke, D. Singh, and T. H. Eickbush
R5 Retrotransposons Insert into a Family of Infrequently Transcribed 28S rRNA Genes of Planaria
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2003; 20(8): 1260 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
S. Yamamoto, H. Kasai, D. L. Arnold, R. W. Jackson, A. Vivian, and S. Harayama
Phylogeny of the genus Pseudomonas: intrageneric structure reconstructed from the nucleotide sequences of gyrB and rpoD genes
Microbiology, October 1, 2000; 146(10): 2385 - 2394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Billoud, M.-A. Guerrucci, M. Masselot, and J. S. Deutsch
Cirripede Phylogeny Using a Novel Approach: Molecular Morphometrics
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2000; 17(10): 1435 - 1445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. G. Eickbush, D. D. Luan, and T. H. Eickbush
Integration of Bombyx mori R2 Sequences into the 28S Ribosomal RNA Genes of Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. I. Antón, A. J. Martínez-Murcia, and F. Rodríguez-Valera
Intraspecific Diversity of the 23S rRNA Gene and the Spacer Region Downstream in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol., May 1, 1999; 181(9): 2703 - 2709.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Yang and T. H. Eickbush
RNA-Induced Changes in the Activity of the Endonuclease Encoded by the R2 Retrotransposable Element
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 1998; 18(6): 3455 - 3465.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. P. Mauro and G. M. Edelman
rRNA-like sequences occur in diverse primary transcripts: Implications for the control of gene expression
PNAS, January 21, 1997; 94(2): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.