Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 27, 2009
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(7):1523-1531; doi:10.1093/molbev/msp063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/7/1523    most recent
msp063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Variation in the Ratio of Nucleotide Substitution and Indel Rates across Genomes in Mammals and Bacteria

Jian-Qun Chen*,1, Ying Wu*,1, Haiwang Yang*, Joy Bergelson*,{dagger}, Martin Kreitman{dagger} and Dacheng Tian*

* State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Biology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
{dagger} Department of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago

E-mail: dtian{at}nju.edu.cn.

Accepted for publication March 24, 2009.

Rates of nucleotide substitution and insertion/deletion (indel) are known to vary across the functional components of a genome. Little attention has been paid, however, to the quantitative relationship between the two. Here we investigate the ratio of nucleotide substitutions to indels (S/I) in different regions of 4 primates, 70 bacteria, and 8 other genomes. We find that the ratio differs at 5.4-times between coding and noncoding, 3.3-times between conserved and less conserved coding sequences, and 1.46-times between nonrepeat and repeat regions. The S/I ratio is also positively correlated with the level of divergence between the genomes compared. Our results suggest that the S/I ratio may reflect differences in the efficacy of selection against indels. Due to the sensitivity of indel density in different regions, this ratio varies over a much larger range. With the recent discovery suggesting that indels act as local enhancers of mutation in surrounding sequences, nucleotide substitution rates are expected to be accelerated in regions of low constraint, where indels tend to accumulate, but will otherwise be modulated in proportion to the level of a sequence's functional constraint. Indels, therefore, may play a nontrivial role in controlling differences in genetic variation and divergence across functional regions of a genome.

Key Words: SNP • insertion/deletion • evolutionary rate • divergence


1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Douglas Crawford, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
W. Amos
Even small SNP clusters are non-randomly distributed: is this evidence of mutational non-independence?
Proc R Soc B, January 13, 2010; (2010) rspb.2009.1757v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gen Biol EvolHome page
C.-H. Chen, T.-J. Chuang, B.-Y. Liao, and F.-C. Chen
Scanning for the Signatures of Positive Selection for Human-Specific Insertions and Deletions
Gen Biol Evol, November 23, 2009; 2009(0): 415 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.