Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2009
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(6):1341-1355; doi:10.1093/molbev/msp043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/6/1341    most recent
msp043v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rieseberg, L. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rieseberg, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Genomic Patterns of Adaptive Divergence between Chromosomally Differentiated Sunflower Species

Jared L. Strasburg*, Caroline Scotti-Saintagne*,1, Ivan Scotti{dagger}, Zhao Lai{ddagger} and Loren H. Rieseberg*,§

* Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington
{dagger} INRA–UMR ECOFOG, Campus agronomique—Avenue de France, Kourou, French Guiana
{ddagger} Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington
§ Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

E-mail: jstrasbu{at}indiana.edu.

Accepted for publication March 5, 2009.

Understanding the genetic mechanisms of speciation and basis of species differences is among the most important challenges in evolutionary biology. Two questions of particular interest are what roles divergent selection and chromosomal differentiation play in these processes. A number of recently proposed theories argue that chromosomal rearrangements can facilitate the development and maintenance of reproductive isolation and species differences by suppressing recombination within rearranged regions. Reduced recombination permits the accumulation of alleles contributing to isolation and adaptive differentiation and protects existing differences from the homogenizing effects of introgression between incipient species. Here, we examine patterns of genetic diversity and divergence in rearranged versus collinear regions in two widespread, extensively hybridizing sunflower species, Helianthus annuus and Helianthus petiolaris, using sequence data from 77 loci distributed throughout the genomes of the two species. We find weak evidence for increased genetic divergence near chromosomal break points but not within rearranged regions overall. We find no evidence for increased rates of adaptive divergence on rearranged chromosomes; in fact, collinear chromosomes show a far greater excess of fixed amino acid differences between the two species. A comparison with a third sunflower species indicates that much of the nonsynonymous divergence between H. annuus and H. petiolaris probably occurred during or soon after their formation. Our results suggest a limited role for chromosomal rearrangements in genetic divergence, but they do document substantial adaptive divergence and provide further evidence of how species integrity and genetic identity can be maintained at many loci in the face of extensive hybridization and gene flow.

Key Words: species boundaries • chromosomal rearrangements • positive selection • hybridization • sunflowers • Helianthus


1 Present address: INRA–UMR ECOFOG, Campus agronomique—Avenue de France, Kourou, French Guiana.

Jody Hey, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.