Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(3):579-589; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn279
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/3/579    most recent
msn279v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Near Neutrality, Rate Heterogeneity, and Linkage Govern Mitochondrial Genome Evolution in Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) and Other Gadine Fish

H. Dawn Marshall, Mark W. Coulson and Steven M. Carr

Genetics, Evolution, and Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

E-mail: scarr{at}mun.ca.

Accepted for publication November 29, 2008.

The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genome figures prominently in evolutionary investigations of vertebrate animals due to a suite of characteristics that include absence of Darwinian selection, high mutation rate, and inheritance as a single linkage group. Given complete linkage and selective neutrality, mtDNA gene trees are expected to correspond to intraspecific phylogenies, and mtDNA diversity will reflect population size. The validity of these assumptions is, however, rarely tested on a genome-wide scale. Here, we analyze rates and patterns of molecular evolution among 32 whole mitochondrial genomes of Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) as compared with its sister taxon, the walleye pollock (Gadus [Theragra] chalcogrammus), and genomes of seven other gadine codfish. We evaluate selection within G. morhua, between sister species, and among species and intraspecific measures of linkage disequilibrium and recombination within G. morhua. Strong rate heterogeneity occurs among sites and genes at all levels of hierarchical comparison, consistent with variation in mutation rates across the genome. Neutrality indices (dN/dS) are significantly greater than unity among G. morhua genomes and between sister species, which suggests that polymorphisms within species are slightly deleterious, as expected under the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Among species of gadines, dN/dS ratios are heterogeneous among genes, consistent with purifying selection and variation in functional constraint among genes rather than positive selection. The dN/dS ratio for ND4L is anomalously high across all hierarchical levels. There is no evidence for recombination within G. morhua. These patterns contrast strongly with those reported for humans: genome-wide patterns in other vertebrates should be investigated to elucidate the complex patterns of mtDNA molecular evolution.

Key Words: mitogenomics • rate heterogeneity • nonsynonymous-to-synonymous ratio • recombination • Gadus morhua • gadine fishes • slightly deleterious polymorphisms


David Irwin, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.