Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on October 8, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26(1):111-121; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn230
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/111    most recent
msn230v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loire, E.
Right arrow Articles by Achaz, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loire, E.
Right arrow Articles by Achaz, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Hypermutability of Genes in Homo sapiens Due to the Hosting of Long Mono-SSR

Etienne Loire*,{dagger},{ddagger},§,||,#,**, Françoise Praz{dagger}{dagger},{ddagger}{ddagger}, Dominique Higuet§,||,#, Pierre Netter*,{dagger},{ddagger} and Guillaume Achaz§,||,#,**

* Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Unité Mixte de recherche (UMR) 7592, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France
{dagger} Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 7592, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France
{ddagger} Université Denis Diderot-Paris7, UMR 7592, Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France
§ Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, UMR 7138, Systématique, Adaptation, Evolution, Paris, France
|| CNRS, UMR 7138, Systématique, Adaptation Evolution, Paris, France
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7138, Systématique Adaptation Evolution, Paris, France
# Institut National de al Sauté et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR 7138, Systématique, Adaptation Evolution, Paris, France
** Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Atelier de Bioinformatique, Paris, France
{dagger}{dagger} Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, UMR_S 893, CdR Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
{ddagger}{ddagger} INSERM, UMR_S 893, CdR Saint-Antoine, Paris, France

E-mail: loire{at}abi.snv.jussieu.fr.

Accepted for publication October 5, 2008.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are very common short repeats in eukaryotic genomes. "Long" SSRs are considered "hypermutable" sequences because they exhibit a high rate of expansion and contraction. Because they are potentially deleterious, long SSRs tend to be uncommon in coding sequences. However, several genes contain long SSRs in their exonic sequences. Here, we identify 1,291 human genes that host a mononucleotide SSR long enough to be prone to expansion or contraction, being called hypermutable hereafter. On the basis of Gene Ontology annotations, we show that only a restricted number of functions are overrepresented among those hypermutable genes including cell cycle and maintenance of DNA integrity. Using a probabilistic model, we show that genes involved in these functions are expected to host long SSRs because they tend to be long and/or are biased in nucleotide composition. Finally, we show that for almost all functions we observe fewer hypermutable sequences than expected under a neutral model. There are however interesting exceptions, for example, genes involved in protein and RNA transport, as well as meiosis and mismatch repair functions that have as many hypermutable genes as expected under neutrality. Conversely, there are functions (e.g., collagen-related genes) where hypermutable genes are more often avoided than in other functions. Our results show that, even though several functions harbor unusually long SSR in their exons, long SSRs are deleterious sequences in almost all functions and are removed by purifying selection. The strength of this purifying selection however greatly varies from function to function. We discuss possible explanations for this intriguing result.

Key Words: microsatellites • SSR • evolution • mutability • Homo sapiens


Naruya Saitou, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Zaanan, P. Cuilliere-Dartigues, A. Guilloux, Y. Parc, C. Louvet, A. de Gramont, E. Tiret, S. Dumont, B. Gayet, P. Validire, et al.
Impact of p53 expression and microsatellite instability on stage III colon cancer disease-free survival in patients treated by 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin
Ann. Onc., October 15, 2009; (2009) mdp383v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.