MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 5, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(8):1593-1601; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn107
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Distinct Evolutionary Patterns between Chemoreceptors of 2 Vertebrate Olfactory Systems and the Differential Tuning Hypothesis
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan
E-mail: jianzhi{at}umich.edu.
Accepted for publication April 29, 2008.
Most tetrapod vertebrates have 2 olfactory systems, the main olfactory system (MOS) and the vomeronasal system (VNS). According to the dual olfactory hypothesis, the MOS detects environmental odorants, whereas the VNS recognizes intraspecific pheromonal cues. However, this strict functional distinction has been blurred by recent reports that both systems can perceive both types of signals. Studies of a limited number of receptors suggest that MOS receptors are broadly tuned generalists, whereas VNS receptors are narrowly tuned specialists. However, whether this distinction applies to all MOS and VNS receptors remains unknown. The differential tuning hypothesis predicts that generalist MOS receptors detect an overlapping set of ligands and thus are more likely to be conserved over evolutionary time than specialist VNS receptors, which would evolve in a more lineage-specific manner. Here we test this prediction for all olfactory chemoreceptors by examining the evolutionary patterns of MOS-expressed odorant receptors (ORs) and trace amine–associated receptors (TAARs) and VNS-expressed vomeronasal type 1 receptors (V1Rs) and vomeronasal type 2 receptors (V2Rs) in 7 tetrapods (mouse, rat, dog, opossum, platypus, chicken, and frog). The phylogenies of V1Rs and V2Rs show abundant lineage-specific gene gains/losses and virtually no one-to-one orthologs between species. Opposite patterns are found for ORs and TAARs. Analysis of functional data and ligand-binding sites of ORs confirms that paralogous chemoreceptors are more likely than orthologs to have different ligands and that functional divergence between paralogous chemoreceptors is established relatively quickly following gene duplication. Together, these results strongly suggest that the functional profile of the VNS chemoreceptor repertoire evolves much faster than that of the MOS chemoreceptor repertoire and that the differential tuning hypothesis applies to the majority, if not all, of MOS and VNS receptors.
Key Words: V1R • V2R • OR • TAAR • vomeronasal • olfactory
Adriana Briscoe, Associate Editor
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. G. Than, R. Romero, M. Goodman, A. Weckle, J. Xing, Z. Dong, Y. Xu, F. Tarquini, A. Szilagyi, P. Gal, et al. A primate subfamily of galectins expressed at the maternal-fetal interface that promote immune cell death PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(24): 9731 - 9736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. E. Grus and J. Zhang Origin of the Genetic Components of the Vomeronasal System in the Common Ancestor of all Extant Vertebrates Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2009; 26(2): 407 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|