Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 18, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(7):1512-1520; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/7/1512    most recent
msn098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruenheit, N.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gruenheit, N.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Difficulties in Testing for Covarion-Like Properties of Sequences under the Confounding Influence of Changing Proportions of Variable Sites

Nicole Gruenheit*, Peter J. Lockhart{dagger}, Mike Steel{ddagger} and William Martin*

* Institute of Botany III, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
{dagger} Institute for Molecular BioSciences, Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
{ddagger} Biomathematics Research Centre, Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

E-mail: nicole.gruenheit{at}uni-duesseldorf.de.

Accepted for publication April 13, 2008.

The covarion (COV)-like properties of sequences are poorly described and their impact on phylogenetic analyses poorly understood. We demonstrate using simulations that, under an evolutionary model where the proportion of variable sites changes in nonadjacent lineages, log likelihood values for rates across site (RAS) and COV models become similar, making models difficult to distinguish. Further, although COV and RAS models provide a great improvement in likelihood scores over a homogeneous model with these simulated data, reconstruction accuracy of tree building is low, suggesting caution when it is suspected that proportions of variable sites differ in different evolutionary lineages. We study the performance of a recently developed contingency test that detects the presence of COV-type evolution modified for protein data. We report that if proportions of variable sites (pvar) change in a lineage-specific manner such that their distributions in different lineages become sufficiently nonoverlapping, then the contingency test can incorrectly suggest a homogeneous model. Also of concern is the possibility of different proportions of variable sites between the groups being studied. In a study of chloroplast proteins, interpretation of the test is found to be susceptible to different partitioning of taxon groups, making the test very subjective in its implementation. Extreme intergroup differences in the extent of divergence and difference in proportions of variable sites could be contributing to this effect.

Key Words: covarion • phylogenetics • chloroplast proteins • contingency test


Andrew Roger, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. W. Graham and W. J. D. Iles
Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 216 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.