MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 21, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(5):821-830; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
Near Intron Positions Are Reliable Phylogenetic Markers: An Application to Holometabolous Insects
,
* Department of Genetics, Institute of Biology II, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; RNomics Group, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapie and Immunology, Leipzig; Institute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM
E-mail: krauss{at}rz.uni-leipzig.de.
Accepted for publication January 7, 2008.
Today, the reconstruction of the organismal evolutionary tree is based mainly on molecular sequence data. However, sequence data are sometimes insufficient to reliably resolve in particular deep branches. Thus, it is highly desirable to find novel, more reliable types of phylogenetic markers that can be derived from the wealth of genomic data. Here, we consider the gain of introns close to older preexisting ones. Because correct splicing is impeded by very small exons, nearby pairs of introns very rarely coexist, that is, the gain of the new intron is nearly always associated with the loss of the old intron. Both events may even be directly connected as in cases of intron migration. Therefore, it should be possible to identify one of the introns as ancient (plesiomorphic) and the other as novel (derived or apomorphic). To test the suitability of such near intron pairs (NIPs) as a marker class for phylogenetic analysis, we undertook an analysis of the evolutionary positions of bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) and beetles (Coleoptera) in relation to moths (Lepidoptera) and dipterans (Diptera) using recently completed genome project data. By scanning 758 putatively orthologous gene structures of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera), we identified 189 pairs of introns, one from each species, which are located less than 50 nt from each other. A comparison with genes from 5 other holometabolan and 9 metazoan outgroup genomes resulted in 22 shared derived intron positions found in beetle as well as in butterflies and/or dipterans. This strongly supports a basal position of hymenopterans in the holometabolous insect tree. In addition, we found 31 and 12 intron positions apomorphic for A. mellifera and T. castaneum, respectively, which seem to represent changes inside these branches. Another 12 intron pairs indicate parallel intron gains or extraordinarily small exons. In conclusion, we show here that the analysis of phylogenetically nested, nearby intron pairs is suitable to identify evolutionarily younger intron positions and to determine their relative age, which should be of equal importance for the understanding of intron evolution and the reconstruction of the eukaryotic tree.
Key Words: intron evolution • molecular phylogenetics • near intron pair (NIP) • intron gain • insect phylogeny
Barbara Ruth Holland, Associate Editor