Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(4):778-786; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/4/778    most recent
msn024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutter, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cutter, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Divergence Times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila Inferred from Direct Estimates of the Neutral Mutation Rate

Asher D. Cutter

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

E-mail: asher.cutter{at}utoronto.ca.

Accepted for publication January 21, 2008.

Accurate inference of the dates of common ancestry among species forms a central problem in understanding the evolutionary history of organisms. Molecular estimates of divergence time rely on the molecular evolutionary prediction that neutral mutations and substitutions occur at the same constant rate in genomes of related species. This underlies the notion of a molecular clock. Most implementations of this idea depend on paleontological calibration to infer dates of common ancestry, but taxa with poor fossil records must rely on external, potentially inappropriate, calibration with distantly related species. The classic biological models Caenorhabditis and Drosophila are examples of such problem taxa. Here, I illustrate internal calibration in these groups with direct estimates of the mutation rate from contemporary populations that are corrected for interfering effects of selection on the assumption of neutrality of substitutions. Divergence times are inferred among 6 species each of Caenorhabditis and Drosophila, based on thousands of orthologous groups of genes. I propose that the 2 closest known species of Caenorhabditis shared a common ancestor <24 MYA (Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis sp. 5) and that Caenorhabditis elegans diverged from its closest known relatives <30 MYA, assuming that these species pass through at least 6 generations per year; these estimates are much more recent than reported previously with molecular clock calibrations from non-nematode phyla. Dates inferred for the common ancestor of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans are roughly concordant with previous studies. These revised dates have important implications for rates of genome evolution and the origin of self-fertilization in Caenorhabditis.

Key Words: divergence time • Caenorhabditis • Drosophila • molecular evolution

John H. McDonald, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gen Biol EvolHome page
C. Feschotte, U. Keswani, N. Ranganathan, M. L. Guibotsy, and D. Levine
Exploring Repetitive DNA Landscapes Using REPCLASS, a Tool That Automates the Classification of Transposable Elements in Eukaryotic Genomes
Gen Biol Evol, August 12, 2009; 2009(0): 205 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. D. Cutter, A. Dey, and R. L. Murray
Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2009; 26(6): 1199 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. C. Sleumer, M. Bilenky, A. He, G. Robertson, N. Thiessen, and S. J. M. Jones
Caenorhabditis elegans cisRED: a catalogue of conserved genomic elements
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2009; 37(4): 1323 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Phillips, M. Salomon, A. Custer, D. Ostrow, and C. F. Baer
Spontaneous Mutational and Standing Genetic (Co)variation at Dinucleotide Microsatellites in Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 659 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
J. H. Thomas
Genome evolution in Caenorhabditis
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, June 23, 2008; (2008) eln022v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
B. R. Riddle, M. N. Dawson, E. A. Hadly, D. J. Hafner, M. J. Hickerson, S. J. Mantooth, and A. D. Yoder
The role of molecular genetics in sculpting the future of integrative biogeography
Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 173 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and N. L. Washington
Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Caenorhabditis Preclude Ancient Origins of Selfing
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2093 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.