MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 9, 2008
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008 25(11):2331-2336; doi:10.1093/molbev/msn177
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Articles |
The Legacy of Domestication: Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations in the Dog Genome
,

* Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Department of Evolution, Genomics and Systematics, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen, Uppsala, Sweden
Estación Biológica de Doñana-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avd. María Luisa s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
E-mail: matthew.webster{at}imbim.uu.se.
Accepted for publication August 1, 2008.
Dogs exhibit more phenotypic variation than any other mammal and are affected by a wide variety of genetic diseases. However, the origin and genetic basis of this variation is still poorly understood. We examined the effect of domestication on the dog genome by comparison with its wild ancestor, the gray wolf. We compared variation in dog and wolf genes using whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. The dN/dS ratio (
) was around 50% greater for SNPs found in dogs than in wolves, indicating that a higher proportion of nonsynonymous alleles segregate in dogs compared with nonfunctional genetic variation. We suggest that the majority of these alleles are slightly deleterious and that two main factors may have contributed to their increase. The first is a relaxation of selective constraint due to a population bottleneck and altered breeding patterns accompanying domestication. The second is a reduction of effective population size at loci linked to those under positive selection due to Hill–Robertson interference. An increase in slightly deleterious genetic variation could contribute to the prevalence of disease in modern dog breeds.
Key Words: genetic drift bottleneck selective constraint purifying selection domestication dog genome
John H McDonald, Associate Editor
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Ramirez, A. Ojeda, A. Tomas, D. Gallardo, L.S. Huang, J.M. Folch, A. Clop, A. Sanchez, B. Badaoui, O. Hanotte, et al. Integrating Y-Chromosome, Mitochondrial, and Autosomal Data to Analyze the Origin of Pig Breeds Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2009; 26(9): 2061 - 2072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Parker, B. M. VonHoldt, P. Quignon, E. H. Margulies, S. Shao, D. S. Mosher, T. C. Spady, A. Elkahloun, M. Cargill, P. G. Jones, et al. An Expressed Fgf4 Retrogene Is Associated with Breed-Defining Chondrodysplasia in Domestic Dogs Science, August 21, 2009; 325(5943): 995 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

