Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(7):1443-1446; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm072
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
24/7/1443    most recent
msm072v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, F.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, T.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, F.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, T.-J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Authors.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Letters

Opposite Evolutionary Effects between Different Alternative Splicing Patterns

Feng-Chi Chen*, Shu-Miaw Chaw{dagger}, Yun-Huei Tzeng{ddagger}, Sheng-Shun Wang{ddagger} and Trees-Juen Chuang{ddagger}

* Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan
{dagger} Research Center for Biodiversity, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
{ddagger} Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

E-mail: trees{at}gate.sinica.edu.tw.

Accepted for publication April 10, 2007.

Alternative splicing (AS) has been recognized as a mechanism of relaxing selection pressure on protein subsequences. Here, we show that AS may also yield contrary evolutionary effects. We compare the evolutionary rates of 2 types of alternatively spliced exons (ASEs)—simple and complex. The former does not change the boundaries of its flanking exons, whereas the latter does. By analyzing over 26,000 human–mouse orthologous exons, we demonstrate that complex ASEs have lower Ka and Ka/Ks ratio and higher Ks than constitutively spliced exons (CSEs), whereas simple ASEs have evolutionary rates to the opposite of CSEs. Our results indicate that complex ASEs are subject to stronger selection pressure than CSEs at the protein level, but the trend is reversed at the RNA level. Therefore, the previous view that ASEs accelerate evolution of protein subsequences needs to be modified.

Key Words: simple alternatively spliced exons • complex alternatively spliced exons • constitutively spliced exons • selective constraint • lineage specificity • comparative genomics

Sudhir Kumar, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome Res.Home page
Y.-T. Huang, F.-C. Chen, C.-J. Chen, H.-L. Chen, and T.-J. Chuang
Identification and analysis of ancestral hominoid transcriptome inferred from cross-species transcript and processed pseudogene comparisons
Genome Res., July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1163 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.