Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 7, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(6):1286-1299; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/6/1286    most recent
msm046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gowri-Shankar, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rattray, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gowri-Shankar, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rattray, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

A Reversible Jump Method for Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with a Nonhomogeneous Substitution Model

Vivek Gowri-Shankar and Magnus Rattray

School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

E-mail: magnus.rattray{at}manchester.ac.uk.

Accepted for publication March 4, 2007.

Nonhomogeneous substitution models have been introduced for phylogenetic inference when the substitution process is nonstationary, for example, when sequence composition differs between lineages. Existing models can have many parameters, and it is then difficult and computationally expensive to learn the parameters and to select the optimal model complexity. We extend an existing nonhomogeneous substitution model by introducing a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method for efficient Bayesian inference of the model order along with other phylogenetic parameters of interest. We also introduce a new hierarchical prior which leads to more reasonable results when only a small number of lineages share a particular substitution process. The method is implemented in the PHASE software, which includes specialized substitution models for RNA genes with conserved secondary structure. We apply an RNA-specific nonhomogeneous model to a structure-based alignment of rRNA sequences spanning the entire tree of life. A previous study of the same genes from a similar set of species found robust evidence for a mesophilic last universal common ancestor (LUCA) by inference of the G + C composition at the root of the tree. In the present study, we find that the helical GC composition at the root is strongly dependent on the root position. With a bacterial rooting, we find that there is no longer strong support for either a mesophile or a thermophile LUCA, although a hyperthermophile LUCA remains unlikely. We discuss reasons why results using only RNA helices may differ from results using all aligned sites when applying nonhomogeneous models to RNA genes.

Key Words: Bayesian phylogeny • nonhomogeneous • nonstationary • RNA substitution model • MCMC • compositional bias


Manolo Gouy, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. C. Sheffield, H. Song, S. L. Cameron, and M. F. Whiting
Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 381 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Blanquart and N. Lartillot
A Site- and Time-Heterogeneous Model of Amino Acid Replacement
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 842 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.