Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(5):1198-1207; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
24/5/1198    most recent
msm038v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Authors.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Research Articles

Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Odorant Receptor Genes

Sheng Guo*,{ddagger} and Junhyong Kim*,{dagger},{ddagger}

* Penn Center for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania
{dagger} Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania
{ddagger} Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania

E-mail: junhyong{at}sas.upenn.edu.

Accepted for publication February 26, 2007.

A total of 752 odorant receptor (Or) genes, including pseudogenes, were identified in 11 Drosophila species and named after their orthologs in Drosophila melanogaster. The 813 Or genes, including 61 from D. melanogaster, were classified into 59 orthologous groups that are well supported by gene phylogeny. By reconciling with the gene family phylogeny, we estimated the number of gene duplication/loss events and intron gain/loss events in the species phylogeny. We found that these events are particularly frequent in Drosophila grimshawi, Drosophila willistoni, and obscura group. More than half of the duplicated genes stay as tandem arrays, whose size range from 2 to 8. These genes vary in sequence and some likely underwent positive selection, indicating that the gene duplication was important for flies to acquire new olfactory functions. We hypothesize that Or genes conferred the basic olfactory repertoire to ancestral flies before the speciation of the Drosophila and Sophophora subgenera about 40 Mya. This repertoire has been largely maintained in the current species, whereas lineage-specific gene duplication seems to have led to additional specialization in some species in response to specific ecological conditions.

Key Words: Drosophila • odorant receptor • molecular evolution • phylogeny • duplication


Adriana Briscoe, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. B. Kent, K. K.O. Walden, and H. M. Robertson
The Gr Family of Candidate Gustatory and Olfactory Receptors in the Yellow-Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 79 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Nozawa, Y. Kawahara, and M. Nei
From the Cover: Genomic drift and copy number variation of sensory receptor genes in humans
PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20421 - 20426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. S. McBride, J. R. Arguello, and B. C. O'Meara
Five Drosophila Genomes Reveal Nonneutral Evolution and the Signature of Host Specialization in the Chemoreceptor Superfamily
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1395 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.