Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 28, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(12):2755-2762; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm210
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/12/2755    most recent
msm210v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, L. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

Evidence for a Trade-Off between Translational Efficiency and Splicing Regulation in Determining Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila melanogaster

Tobias Warnecke and Laurence D. Hurst

Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom

E-mail: l.d.hurst{at}bath.ac.uk.

Accepted for publication September 24, 2007.

In Drosophila melanogaster, synonymous codons corresponding to the most abundant cognate tRNAs are used more frequently, especially in highly expressed genes. Increased use of such "optimal" codons is considered an adaptation for translational efficiency. Need it always be the case that selection should favor the use of a translationally optimal codon? Here, we investigate one possible confounding factor, namely, the need to specify information in exons necessary to enable correct splicing. As expected from such a model, in Drosophila many codons show different usage near intron–exon boundaries versus exon core regions. However, this finding is in principle also consistent with Hill–Robertson effects modulating usage of translationally optimal codons. However, several results support the splice model over the translational selection model: 1) the trends in codon usage are strikingly similar to those in mammals in which codon usage near boundaries correlates with abundance in exonic splice enhancers (ESEs), 2) codons preferred near boundaries tend to be enriched for A and avoid C (conversely those avoided near boundaries prefer C rather than A), as expected were ESEs involved, and 3) codons preferred near boundaries are typically not translationally optimal. We conclude that usage of translationally optimal codons usage is compromised in the vicinity of splice junctions in intron-containing genes, to the effect that we observe higher levels of usage of translationally optimal codons at the center of exons. On the gene level, however, controlling for known correlates of codon bias, the impact on codon usage patterns is quantitatively small. These results have implications for inferring aspects of the mechanism of splicing given nothing more than a well-annotated genome.

Key Words: splicing • codon usage bias • Hill–Robertson interference • ESE • Drosophila melanogaster


Dan Graur, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Zeng and B. Charlesworth
Estimating Selection Intensity on Synonymous Codon Usage in a Nonequilibrium Population
Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 651 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Zhou, M. Weems, and C. O. Wilke
Translationally Optimal Codons Associate with Structurally Sensitive Sites in Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1571 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gen Biol EvolHome page
V. L. Bauer DuMont, N. D. Singh, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro
Locus-Specific Decoupling of Base Composition Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia Lineages
Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. Haerty and B. Golding
Similar Selective Factors Affect Both between-Gene and between-Exon Divergence in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2009; 26(4): 859 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
U. Friberg and W. R. Rice
Cut Thy Neighbor: Cyclic Birth and Death of Recombination Hotspots via Genetic Conflict
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2229 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.