Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007 24(11):2485-2494; doi:10.1093/molbev/msm183
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/2485    most recent
msm183v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hoek, M. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hogeweg, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hoek, M. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hogeweg, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Articles

The Role of Mutational Dynamics in Genome Shrinkage

Milan J. A. van Hoek and Paulien Hogeweg

Theoretical Biology/Bioinformatics Group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands

E-mail: m.j.a.vanhoek{at}bio.uu.nl.

Accepted for publication August 22, 2007.

Genome shrinkage occurs after whole genome duplications (WGDs) and in the evolution of parasitic or symbiotic species. The dynamics of this process, whether it occurs by single gene deletions or also by larger deletions are however unknown. In yeast, genome shrinkage has occurred after a WGD. Using a computational model of genome evolution, we show that in a random genome single gene deletions cannot explain the observed pattern of gene loss in yeast. The distribution of genes deleted per event can be very well described by a geometric distribution, with a mean of 1.1 genes per event. In terms of deletions of a stretch of base pairs, we find that a geometric distribution with an average of 500–600 base pairs per event describes the data very well. Moreover, in the model, as in the data, gene pairs that have a small intergenic distance are more likely to be both deleted. This proves that simultaneous deletion of multiple genes causes the observed pattern of gene deletions, rather than deletion of functionally clustered genes by selection. Furthermore, we found that in the bacterium Buchnera aphidicola larger deletions than in yeast are necessary to explain the clustering of deleted genes. We show that the excess clustering of deleted genes in B. aphidicola can be explained by the clustering of genes in operons. Therefore, we show that selection has little effect on the clustering of deleted genes after the WGD in yeast, while it has during genome shrinkage in B. aphidicola.

Key Words: whole genome duplication • genome shrinkage • Saccharomyces cerevisiae • Buchnera aphidicola • gene deletion • computational model


William Martin, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.