Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 5, 2006
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(8):1457-1459; doi:10.1093/molbev/msl021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/8/1457    most recent
msl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plotkin, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letter

Estimating Selection Pressures from Limited Comparative Data

Joshua B. Plotkin*, Jonathan Dushoff{dagger}, Michael M. Desai{ddagger} and Hunter B. Fraser§

* Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania; {dagger} Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University; {ddagger} Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Department of Physics, Harvard University; and § Broad Institute of Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

E-mail: jplotkin{at}sas.upenn.edu.

We recently introduced a novel method for estimating selection pressures on proteins, termed "volatility," which requires only a single genome sequence. Some criticisms that have been levied against this approach are valid, but many others are based on misconceptions of volatility, or they apply equally to comparative methods of estimating selection. Here, we introduce a simple regression technique for estimating selection pressures on all proteins in a genome, on the basis of limited comparative data. The regression technique does not depend on an underlying population-genetic mechanism. This new approach to estimating selection across a genome should be more powerful and more widely applicable than volatility itself.

Key Words: volatility • codon usage • selection • comparative method


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker
Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.