Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on December 21, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(5):901-910; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/901    most recent
msj084v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, L.
Right arrow Articles by Penny, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, L.
Right arrow Articles by Penny, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005

Investigating the Intron Recognition Mechanism in Eukaryotes

Lesley Collins and David Penny

Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

E-mail: l.j.collins{at}massey.ac.nz.

Recent studies indicate that many introns, as well as the complex spliceosomal mechanism to remove them, were present early in eukaryotic evolution. This study examines intron and exon characteristics from annotations of whole genomes to investigate the intron recognition mechanism. Exon definition uses the exon as the unit of recognition, placing length constraints on the exon but not on the intron (allowing it a greater range of lengths). In contrast, intron definition uses the intron itself as the unit of recognition and thus removes constraints on internal exon length forced by the use of an exon definition mechanism. Thus, intron and exon lengths within a genome can reflect the constraints imposed by its splicing. This study shows that it is possible firstly to recover valid intron and exon information from genome annotation. We then compare internal intron and exon information from a range of eukaryotic genomes and investigate possible evolutionary length constraints on introns and exons and how they can impact on the intron recognition mechanism. Results indicate that exon definition–based mechanisms may predominate in vertebrates although the exact system in fish is expected to show some differences with the better characterized system from mammals. We also raise the possibility that the last common ancestor of plants and animals contained some type of exon definition and that this mechanism was replaced in some genes and lineages by intron definition, possibly as a result of intron loss and/or intron shortening.

Key Words: intron definition • exon definition • molecular evolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Irimia, J. L. Rukov, D. Penny, J. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Vinther, and S. W. Roy
Widespread Evolutionary Conservation of Alternatively Spliced Exons in Caenorhabditis
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 375 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
S. Schwartz, J. Silva, D. Burstein, T. Pupko, E. Eyras, and G. Ast
Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes
Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 88 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. G. Kurland, L. J. Collins, and D. Penny
Genomics and the irreducible nature of eukaryote cells.
Science, May 19, 2006; 312(5776): 1011 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.