Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 8, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(1):144-151; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/144    most recent
msj015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, X.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Research Article

Higher Duplicability of Less Important Genes in Yeast Genomes

Xionglei He and Jianzhi Zhang

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

E-mail: jianzhi{at}umich.edu.

Gene duplication plays an important role in evolution because it is the primary source of new genes. Many recent studies showed that gene duplicability varies considerably among genes. Several considerations led us to hypothesize that less important genes have higher rates of successful duplications, where gene importance is measured by the fitness reduction caused by the deletion of the gene. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing the importance of two groups of singleton genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sce). Group S genes did not duplicate in four other yeast species examined, whereas group D experienced duplication in these species. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found group D genes to be less important than group S genes. Specifically, 17% of group D genes are essential in Sce, compared to 28% for group S. Furthermore, deleting a group D gene in Sce reduces the fitness by 24% on average, compared to 38% for group S. Our subsequent analysis showed that less important genes have more cis-regulatory motifs, which could lead to a higher chance of subfunctionalization of duplicate genes and result in an enhanced rate of gene retention. Less important genes may also have weaker dosage imbalance effects and cause fewer genetic perturbations when duplicated. Regardless of the cause, our observation indicates that the previous finding of a less severe fitness consequence of deleting a duplicate gene than deleting a singleton gene is at least in part due to the fact that duplicate genes are intrinsically less important than singleton genes and suggests that the contribution of duplicate genes to genetic robustness has been overestimated.

Key Words: gene duplicability • yeast • gene dispensability • gene importance • functional compensation • genetic robustness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Gen Biol EvolHome page
W. Qian and J. Zhang
Protein Subcellular Relocalization in the Evolution of Yeast Singleton and Duplicate Genes
Gen Biol Evol, October 19, 2009; 2009(0): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eukaryot CellHome page
J. Ocampo, L. Fernandez Nunez, F. Silva, E. Pereyra, S. Moreno, V. Garre, and S. Rossi
A Subunit of Protein Kinase A Regulates Growth and Differentiation in the Fungus Mucor circinelloides
Eukaryot. Cell, July 1, 2009; 8(7): 933 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
W. Qian and J. Zhang
Gene Dosage and Gene Duplicability
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2319 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
G. Musso, M. Costanzo, M. Huangfu, A. M. Smith, J. Paw, B.-J. San Luis, C. Boone, G. Giaever, C. Nislow, A. Emili, et al.
The extensive and condition-dependent nature of epistasis among whole-genome duplicates in yeast
Genome Res., July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1092 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. R. Johnston, C. O'Dushlaine, D. A. Fitzpatrick, R. J. Edwards, and D. C. Shields
Evaluation of Whether Accelerated Protein Evolution in Chordates Has Occurred before, after, or Simultaneously with Gene Duplication
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 315 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
B. E. Shakhnovich and E. V. Koonin
Origins and impact of constraints in evolution of gene families
Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1529 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. Li, Y. Huang, X. Xia, and Z. Sun
Preferential Duplication in the Sparse Part of Yeast Protein Interaction Network
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2467 - 2473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.