MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006 23(1):121-136; doi:10.1093/molbev/msj020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
The "Fish-Specific" Hox Cluster Duplication Is Coincident with the Origin of Teleosts


* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University;
Bioinformatik, Institut für Informatik, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; and
Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle
E-mail: karen.crow{at}yale.edu.
The Hox gene complement of zebrafish, medaka, and fugu differs from that of other gnathostome vertebrates. These fishes have seven to eight Hox clusters compared to the four Hox clusters described in sarcopterygians and shark. The clusters in different teleost lineages are orthologous, implying that a "fish-specific" Hox cluster duplication has occurred in the stem lineage leading to the most recent common ancestor of zebrafish and fugu. The timing of this event, however, is unknown. To address this question, we sequenced four Hox genes from taxa representing basal actinopterygian and teleost lineages and compared them to known sequences from shark, coelacanth, zebrafish, and other teleosts. The resulting gene genealogies suggest that the fish-specific Hox cluster duplication occurred coincident with the origin of crown group teleosts. In addition, we obtained evidence for an independent Hox cluster duplication in the sturgeon lineage (Acipenseriformes). Finally, results from HoxA11 suggest that duplicated Hox genes have experienced diversifying selection immediately after the duplication event. Taken together, these results support the notion that the duplicated Hox genes of teleosts were causally relevant to adaptive evolution during the initial teleost radiation.
Key Words: Hox cluster genome duplication ray-finned fishes Darwinian selection
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. H. Zakon, D. J. Zwickl, Y. Lu, and D. M. Hillis Molecular evolution of communication signals in electric fish J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1814 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Duboule The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters Development, July 15, 2007; 134(14): 2549 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Semon and K. H. Wolfe Rearrangement Rate following the Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleosts Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 860 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Brunet, H. R. Crollius, M. Paris, J.-M. Aury, P. Gibert, O. Jaillon, V. Laudet, and M. Robinson-Rechavi Gene Loss and Evolutionary Rates Following Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleost Fishes Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1808 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Mulley, C.-h. Chiu, and P. W. H. Holland Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10369 - 10372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Braasch, W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer Asymmetric Evolution in Two Fish-Specifically Duplicated Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Paralogons Involved in Teleost Coloration Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1192 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



