MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 2, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(4):1095-1106; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi096
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Rapid Evolution of the MH Class I Locus Results in Different Allelic Compositions in Recently Diverged Populations of Atlantic Salmon
,2
,4
* Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom; and
Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
E-mail: sonia.consuegra{at}st-andrews.ac.uk.
We compared major histocompatibility class I allelic diversity in two currently reproductively isolated Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations (Irish and Norwegian) with a common postglacial origin in order to test for among-population differences in allelic composition and patterns of recombination and point mutation. We also examined the evidence for adaptive molecular divergence at this locus by analyzing the rate of amino acid replacement in relation to a neutral expectation. Contrary to our prediction, and in contrast to the situation for other genetic markers, the two populations have almost nonoverlapping sets of major histocompatibility class I alleles. Although there is a strong signal of point mutation that predates population divergence, recent recombination, acting in similar, but not identical, ways in both populations appears to be a significant force in creating new alleles. Moreover, selection acting on peptide-binding residues seems to favor new recombinant alleles and is likely to be responsible for the rapid divergence between populations.
Key Words: MHC recombination positive selection Atlantic salmon Salmo salar
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E Yeates, S. Einum, I. A Fleming, H.-J. Megens, R. J.M Stet, K. Hindar, W. V Holt, K. J.W Van Look, and M. J.G Gage Atlantic salmon eggs favour sperm in competition that have similar major histocompatibility alleles Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2009; 276(1656): 559 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Stoffels and H. G. Spencer An Asymmetric Model of Heterozygote Advantage at Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes: Degenerate Pathogen Recognition and Intersection Advantage Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1473 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Miller, M. Andrews-Cookson, and C. H. Daugherty Two Patterns of Variation among MHC Class I Loci in Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) J. Hered., November 21, 2007; (2007) esm095v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cohen, J. Tirindelli, M. Gomez-Chiarri, and D. Nacci Functional implications of Major Histocompatibility (MH) variation using estuarine fish populations Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 1016 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Coughlan, P. McGinnity, B. O'Farrell, E. Dillane, O. Diserud, E. de Eyto, K. Farrell, K. Whelan, R. J.M. Stet, and T. F. Cross Temporal variation in an immune response gene (MHC I) in anadromous Salmo trutta in an Irish river before and during aquaculture activities ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(7): 1248 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Bos and B. Waldman Evolution by Recombination and Transspecies Polymorphism in the MHC Class I Gene of Xenopus laevis Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 137 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





