Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on July 20, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(11):2190-2197; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/2190    most recent
msi217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crainey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crainey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Research Article

The Origin and Evolution of Mosquito APE Retroposons

James L. Crainey, Clare F. Garvey and Colin A. Malcolm

School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom

E-mail: C.A.Malcolm{at}qmul.ac.uk.

The detection of horizontal transfer is important to understanding the origin and spread of transposable elements and in assessing their impact on genetic diversity. The occurrence of the phenomenon is not in doubt for two of the three major groups of elements, but is disputed for retroposons, largely on the grounds of data paucity and overreliance on divergence estimates between host species. We present here the most wide-ranging retroposon data set assembled to date for a species group, the mosquitoes. The results provide no evidence for horizontal transfer events and show conclusively that four previously reported events, involving Juan-A, Juan-C, T1, and Q, did not occur. We propose that the origin of all known mosquito retroposons can be attributed to vertical inheritance and that retroposons have therefore been a persistent source of genetic diversity in mosquito genomes since the emergence of the taxon. Furthermore, the data confirm that the unprecedented levels of retroposon diversity previously reported in Anopheles gambiae extends to at least seven other species representing five genera and all three mosquito subfamilies. Most notably, this included the L1 elements, which are not known in other insects. A number of novel well-defined monophyletic groups were also identified, particularly, JM2 and JM3 within the Jockey clade, which included sequences from seven and five mosquito species, respectively. As JM3 does not contain an Anopheles element, this represents a good example of stochastic loss and the best out of at least four found in this study. This exceptionally diverse data set when compared with the wealth of data available for the many unrelated species with which mosquitoes have intimate contact through blood feeding ought to be fertile ground for the discovery of horizontal transfer events. The absence of positive results therefore supports the view that retroposon horizontal transfer does not occur or is far more exceptional than for other types of transposable elements.

Key Words: horizontal transfer • retroposons • non-LTR retrotransposons • LINEs • mosquitoes • reverse transcriptase


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
I. R. Arkhipova
Distribution and Phylogeny of Penelope-Like Elements in Eukaryotes
Syst Biol, December 1, 2006; 55(6): 875 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.