MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(10):1948-1963; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi191
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press 2005.
Research Article |
Identifying the Basal Angiosperm Node in Chloroplast Genome Phylogenies: Sampling One's Way Out of the Felsenstein Zone
,||
* Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, and The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University; Department of Biological Sciences, Central Washington University; Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and University of California Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Walnut Creek, California; Section of Integrative Biology and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin; and || Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley
E-mail: jleebensmack{at}psu.edu.
While there has been strong support for Amborella and Nymphaeales (water lilies) as branching from basal-most nodes in the angiosperm phylogeny, this hypothesis has recently been challenged by phylogenetic analyses of 61 protein-coding genes extracted from the chloroplast genome sequences of Amborella, Nymphaea, and 12 other available land plant chloroplast genomes. These character-rich analyses placed the monocots, represented by three grasses (Poaceae), as sister to all other extant angiosperm lineages. We have extracted protein-coding regions from draft sequences for six additional chloroplast genomes to test whether this surprising result could be an artifact of long-branch attraction due to limited taxon sampling. The added taxa include three monocots (Acorus, Yucca, and Typha), a water lily (Nuphar), a ranunculid (Ranunculus), and a gymnosperm (Ginkgo). Phylogenetic analyses of the expanded DNA and protein data sets together with microstructural characters (indels) provided unambiguous support for Amborella and the Nymphaeales as branching from the basal-most nodes in the angiosperm phylogeny. However, their relative positions proved to be dependent on the method of analysis, with parsimony favoring Amborella as sister to all other angiosperms and maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining methods favoring an Amborella + Nymphaeales clade as sister. The ML phylogeny supported the later hypothesis, but the likelihood for the former hypothesis was not significantly different. Parametric bootstrap analysis, single-gene phylogenies, estimated divergence dates, and conflicting indel characters all help to illuminate the nature of the conflict in resolution of the most basal nodes in the angiosperm phylogeny. Molecular dating analyses provided median age estimates of 161 MYA for the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all extant angiosperms and 145 MYA for the MRCA of monocots, magnoliids, and eudicots. Whereas long sequences reduce variance in branch lengths and molecular dating estimates, the impact of improved taxon sampling on the rooting of the angiosperm phylogeny together with the results of parametric bootstrap analyses demonstrate how long-branch attraction might mislead genome-scale phylogenetic analyses.
Key Words: angiosperm phylogeny • phylogenomics • parametric bootstrap
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. E. Soltis, C. D. Bell, S. Kim, and P. S. Soltis Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2008; 1133(1): 3 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Moore, C. D. Bell, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19363 - 19368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. K. Jansen, Z. Cai, L. A. Raubeson, H. Daniell, C. W. dePamphilis, J. Leebens-Mack, K. F. Muller, M. Guisinger-Bellian, R. C. Haberle, A. K. Hansen, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19369 - 19374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Shavit, D. Penny, M. D. Hendy, and B. R. Holland The Problem of Rooting Rapid Radiations Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2400 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Zluvova, S. Georgiev, B. Janousek, D. Charlesworth, B. Vyskot, and I. Negrutiu Early Events in the Evolution of the Silene latifolia Y Chromosome: Male Specialization and Recombination Arrest Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 375 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Susko and A. J. Roger On Reduced Amino Acid Alphabets for Phylogenetic Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2139 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-C. Wang, M. Spencer, E. Susko, and A. J. Roger Testing for Covarion-like Evolution in Protein Sequences Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 294 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.-L. Qiu, L. Li, B. Wang, Z. Chen, V. Knoop, M. Groth-Malonek, O. Dombrovska, J. Lee, L. Kent, J. Rest, et al. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence PNAS, October 17, 2006; 103(42): 15511 - 15516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Bateman, J. Hilton, and P. J. Rudall Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3471 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Cui, P. K. Wall, J. H. Leebens-Mack, B. G. Lindsay, D. E. Soltis, J. J. Doyle, P. S. Soltis, J. E. Carlson, K. Arumuganathan, A. Barakat, et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 738 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Turmel, C. Otis, and C. Lemieux The Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Chara vulgaris Sheds New Light into the Closest Green Algal Relatives of Land Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1324 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-C. Chang, H.-C. Lin, I-P. Lin, T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, W.-H. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Liu, C.-C. Chang, et al. The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 279 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Cui, N. Veeraraghavan, A. Richter, K. Wall, R. K. Jansen, J. Leebens-Mack, I. Makalowska, and C. W. dePamphilis ChloroplastDB: the Chloroplast Genome Database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D692 - D696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|