MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 14, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7):1422-1427. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh143
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Research Article |
Accelerated Rates of Intron Gain/Loss and Protein Evolution in Duplicate Genes in Human and Mouse Malaria Parasites
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Masschusetts
E-mail: dhartl{at}oeb.harvard.edu.
Abstract
Very little is known about molecular evolution in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Given the potentially important role that introns play in directing transcription and the posttranscriptional control of gene expression, we compare rates of intron/gain loss and intronic substitution in P. falciparum and the rodent malaria P. y. yoelii in both orthologous and duplicate genes. Specifically, we test the hypothesis that intron gain/loss and protein evolution is accelerated in duplicate genes versus orthologous genes in both parasites using the genome sequence of both species. We find that duplicate genes in both P. falciparum and P. y. yoelii exhibit a dramatic acceleration of both intron gain/loss and protein evolution in comparison with orthologs, suggesting increased directional and/or relaxed selection in duplicate genes. Further, we find that rates of intron gain/loss and protein evolution are weakly coupled in orthologs but not paralogs, supporting the hypothesis that selection acts on genes as functionally integrated units after speciation but not necessarily after gene duplication. In contrast, we find that rates of nucleotide substitution do not differ significantly between intronic sites and synonymous sites among duplicate genes, implying that a large fraction of intronic sites in Plasmodium evolve under little or no selective constraint.
Key Words: gene duplication genome evolution intron gain/loss malaria
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Carmel, I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin Evolutionarily conserved genes preferentially accumulate introns Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny Large-scale intron conservation and order-of-magnitude variation in intron loss/gain rates in apicomplexan evolution Genome Res., October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1270 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy, M. Irimia, and D. Penny Very Little Intron Gain in Entamoeba histolytica Genes Laterally Transferred from Prokaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1824 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Knowles and A. McLysaght High Rate of Recent Intron Gain and Loss in Simultaneously Duplicated Arabidopsis Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1548 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert Rates of intron loss and gain: Implications for early eukaryotic evolution PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5773 - 5778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Shah, R. C. MacFarlane, D. Bhattacharya, J. C. Matese, J. Demeter, S. E. Stroup, and U. Singh Comparative Genomic Hybridizations of Entamoeba Strains Reveal Unique Genetic Fingerprints That Correlate with Virulence Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2005; 4(3): 504 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert Complex early genes PNAS, February 8, 2005; 102(6): 1986 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



