Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 24, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1350    most recent
msh134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bierne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Eyre-Walker, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bierne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Eyre-Walker, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7):1350-1360. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh134
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038


Research Article

The Genomic Rate of Adaptive Amino Acid Substitution in Drosophila

Nicolas Bierne1 and Adam Eyre-Walker

Centre for the Study of Evolution and School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

E-mail: a.c.eyre-walker{at}sussex.ac.uk.

Abstract

The proportion of amino acid substitutions driven by adaptive evolution can potentially be estimated from polymorphism and divergence data by an extension of the McDonald-Kreitman test. We have developed a maximum-likelihood method to do this and have applied our method to several data sets from three Drosophila species: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. yakuba. The estimated number of adaptive substitutions per codon is not uniformly distributed among genes, but follows a leptokurtic distribution. However, the proportion of amino acid substitutions fixed by adaptive evolution seems to be remarkably constant across the genome (i.e., the proportion of amino acid substitutions that are adaptive appears to be the same in fast-evolving and slow-evolving genes; fast-evolving genes have higher numbers of both adaptive and neutral substitutions). Our estimates do not seem to be significantly biased by selection on synonymous codon use or by the assumption of independence among sites. Nevertheless, an accurate estimate is hampered by the existence of slightly deleterious mutations and variations in effective population size. The analysis of several Drosophila data sets suggests that approximately 25% ± 20% of amino acid substitutions were driven by positive selection in the divergence between D. simulans and D. yakuba.

Key Words: Adaptive evolution • McDonald-Kreitman test • amino acid substitutions • Drosophila


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. R. Haddrill, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto
Positive and Negative Selection on Noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1825 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. F. Baines, S. A. Sawyer, D. L. Hartl, and J. Parsch
Effects of X-Linkage and Sex-Biased Gene Expression on the Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1639 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. Egea, S. Casillas, and A. Barbadilla
Standard and generalized McDonald-Kreitman test: a website to detect selection by comparing different classes of DNA sites
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W157 - W162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. P. Foxe, V.-u.-N. Dar, H. Zheng, M. Nordborg, B. S. Gaut, and S. I. Wright
Selection on Amino Acid Substitutions in Arabidopsis
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1375 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker
The McDonald-Kreitman Test and Slightly Deleterious Mutations
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. M. Matzkin
The Molecular Basis of Host Adaptation in Cactophilic Drosophila: Molecular Evolution of a Glutathione S-Transferase Gene (GstD1) in Drosophila mojavensis
Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 1073 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. Nolte and C. Schlotterer
African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Populations Have Similar Levels of Sequence Variability, Suggesting Comparable Effective Population Sizes
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Macpherson, G. Sella, J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov
Genomewide Spatial Correspondence Between Nonsynonymous Divergence and Neutral Polymorphism Reveals Extensive Adaptation in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2083 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
P. Andolfatto
Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1755 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Connallon
Adaptive Protein Evolution of X-linked and Autosomal Genes in Drosophila: Implications for Faster-X Hypotheses
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2566 - 2572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker
The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 16992 - 16997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X. Maside and B. Charlesworth
Patterns of Molecular Variation and Evolution in Drosophila americana and Its Relatives
Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2293 - 2305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. A. Sawyer, J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and D. L. Hartl
Inaugural Article: Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila
PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6504 - 6510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. Shapiro, W. Huang, C. Zhang, M. J. Hubisz, J. Lu, D. A. Turissini, S. Fang, H.-Y. Wang, R. R. Hudson, R. Nielsen, et al.
Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes
PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2271 - 2276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Bachtrog and P. Andolfatto
Selection, Recombination and Demographic History in Drosophila miranda
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2045 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. P. Ponting and G. Lunter
Signatures of adaptive evolution within human non-coding sequence
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R170 - R175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Proschel, Z. Zhang, and J. Parsch
Widespread Adaptive Evolution of Drosophila Genes With Sex-Biased Expression
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 893 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Roze and N. H. Barton
The Hill-Robertson Effect and the Evolution of Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1793 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker
The Rate of Adaptive Evolution in Enteric Bacteria
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1348 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. J. Welch
Estimating the Genomewide Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 821 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K. Thornton, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto
X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution
Genome Res., April 1, 2006; 16(4): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Loewe, B. Charlesworth, C. Bartolome, and V. Noel
Estimating Selection on Nonsynonymous Mutations
Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1079 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
L. Y. Yampolsky, F. A. Kondrashov, and A. S. Kondrashov
Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 1, 2005; 14(21): 3191 - 3201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. B. DuMont and C. F. Aquadro
Multiple Signatures of Positive Selection Downstream of Notch on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 639 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Bartolome, X. Maside, S. Yi, A. L. Grant, and B. Charlesworth
Patterns of Selection on Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Variants in Drosophila miranda
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1495 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Bazin, L. Duret, S. Penel, and N. Galtier
Polymorphix: a sequence polymorphism database
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2005; 33(suppl_1): D481 - D484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.