MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(5):851-859. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh080
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Positive Selection at Reproductive ADAM Genes with Potential Intercellular Binding Activity
Department of Biology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
E-mail: a.civetta{at}uwinnipeg.ca.
Many genes with a role in reproduction, including those implicated in fertilization and spermatogenesis, have been shown to evolve at a faster rate relative to genes associated with other functions and tissues. These survey studies usually group a wide variety of genes with different characteristics and evolutionary histories as reproductive genes based on their site of expression or function. We have examined the molecular evolution of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) gene family, a structurally and functionally diverse group of genes expressed in reproductive and somatic tissue to test whether a variety of protein characteristics such as phylogenetic clusters, tissue of expression, and proteolytic and adhesive function can group fast evolving ADAM genes. We found that all genes were evolving under purifying selection (dN/dS < 1), although reproductive ADAMs, including those implicated in fertilization and spermatogenesis, evolved at the fastest rate. Genes with a role in binding to cell receptors in endogenous tissue appear to be evolving under purifying selection, regardless of the tissue of expression. In contrast, positive selection of codon sites in the disintegrin/cysteine-rich adhesion domains was detected exclusively in ADAMs 2 and 32, two genes expressed in the testis with a potential role in sperm-egg adhesion. Positive selection was detected in the transmembrane/cytosolic tail region of ADAM genes expressed in a variety of tissues.
Key Words: ADAM gene family • reproductive proteins • rapid evolution • positive selection • mouse-human comparisons
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Juarez, I. Comas, F. Gonzalez-Candelas, and J. J. Calvete Evolution of Snake Venom Disintegrins by Positive Darwinian Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2391 - 2407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Turner, E. B. Chuong, and H. E. Hoekstra Comparative Analysis of Testis Protein Evolution in Rodents Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2075 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. L. Bauer DuMont, H. A. Flores, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro Recurrent Positive Selection at Bgcn, a Key Determinant of Germ Line Differentiation, Does Not Appear to be Driven by Simple Coevolution with Its Partner Protein Bam Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 182 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Good and M. W. Nachman Rates of Protein Evolution Are Positively Correlated with Developmental Timing of Expression During Mouse Spermatogenesis Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1044 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|