Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on December 5, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/348    most recent
msh025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phinchongsakuldit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brookfield, J. F. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phinchongsakuldit, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brookfield, J. F. Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(2):348-363. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh025
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Evolution of Developmental Genes: Molecular Microevolution of Enhancer Sequences at the Ubx Locus in Drosophila and Its Impact on Developmental Phenotypes

Jaros Phinchongsakuldit, Stewart MacArthur and John F. Y. Brookfield

Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom

E-mail: john.brookfield{at}nottingham.ac.uk.

Homeotic genes, which function to specify segment identity along the anterior-posterior axis of embryos, are controlled by extensive batteries of enhancer sequences. We have investigated patterns of interspecific and intraspecific molecular variation in three enhancers of the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) locus, which are bx-32.8, pbx32.7, and bxd4.1, from the Drosophila melanogaster species group. These enhancer sequences control Ubx expression by binding to multiple transcription factors encoded by gap, pair-rule, and dorsoventrally expressed genes. Sequence comparisons reveal purifying selection acting on all three enhancers, both in bases binding transcription factors and in bases whose functions are as yet unknown. Neutrality tests largely fail to reject a neutral evolution model. However, using a matrix similarity value to reflect the binding affinity of the protein-binding sites, interspecific and intraspecific variation that may have potential to affect the binding affinity of the sequences homologous to those binding transcription factors in D. melanogaster are discovered, suggesting evolutionary flexibility in the way in which these sequences function in the control of development. As a means of measuring the impact of intraspecific variation on observable phenotypes, we have induced Ubx mutant phenocopies with embryonic ether treatment, and find strong and highly significant variation between D. melanogaster strains in their phenocopy frequencies. This variation shows no significant correlation with the strengths of the mutant phenotypes when the strains are heterozygous with a Ubx null mutation. Estimated phylogenetic trees have been constructed for the three enhancer regions investigated. Neither of the two phenotypic traits investigated shows any significant associations with the phylogeny of any of the three enhancers.

Key Words: Drosophila • Ultrabithorax • phenocopy • developmental evolution • molecular evolution • enhancer sequences


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. de Meaux, A. Pop, and T. Mitchell-Olds
Cis-regulatory Evolution of Chalcone-Synthase Expression in the Genus Arabidopsis
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2181 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. Sun, G. Skogerbo, and R. Chen
Conserved distances between vertebrate highly conserved elements
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2006; 15(19): 2911 - 2922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
M. Ashburner and C. M. Bergman
Drosophila melanogaster: A case study of a model genomic sequence and its consequences
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1661 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. C. Fay and J. A. Benavides
Hypervariable Noncoding Sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1575 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Balhoff and G. A. Wray
Evolutionary analysis of the well characterized endo16 promoter reveals substantial variation within functional sites
PNAS, June 14, 2005; 102(24): 8591 - 8596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. J. Macdonald and A. D. Long
Identifying Signatures of Selection at the Enhancer of split Neurogenic Gene Complex in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 607 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. P. Wagner, C. Fried, S. J. Prohaska, and P. F. Stadler
Divergence of Conserved Non-Coding Sequences: Rate Estimates and Relative Rate Tests
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2004; 21(11): 2116 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.