MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(9):1435-1447. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg152
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Antiquity and Evolution of the MADS-Box Gene Family Controlling Flower Development in Plants
Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University
E-mail: nxm2{at}psu.edu.
MADS-box genes in plants control various aspects of development and reproductive processes including flower formation. To obtain some insight into the roles of these genes in morphological evolution, we investigated the origin and diversification of floral MADS-box genes by conducting molecular evolutionary genetics analyses. Our results suggest that the most recent common ancestor of today's floral MADS-box genes evolved roughly 650 MYA, much earlier than the Cambrian explosion. They also suggest that the functional classes T (SVP), B (and Bs), C, F (AGL20 or TM3), A, and G (AGL6) of floral MADS-box genes diverged sequentially in this order from the class E gene lineage. The divergence between the class G and E genes apparently occurred around the time of the angiosperm/gymnosperm split. Furthermore, the ancestors of three classes of genes (class T genes, class B/Bs genes, and the common ancestor of the other classes of genes) might have existed at the time of the Cambrian explosion. We also conducted a phylogenetic analysis of MADS-domain sequences from various species of plants and animals and presented a hypothetical scenario of the evolution of MADS-box genes in plants and animals, taking into account paleontological information. Our study supports the idea that there are two main evolutionary lineages (type I and type II) of MADS-box genes in plants and animals.
Key Words: MADS-box genes molecular evolution flower development divergence time evolutionary developmental biology
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Tang, J. E. Bowers, X. Wang, R. Ming, M. Alam, and A. H. Paterson Synteny and Collinearity in Plant Genomes Science, April 25, 2008; 320(5875): 486 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Theissen and R. Melzer Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Origin and Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 603 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Verelst, H. Saedler, and T. Munster MIKC* MADS-Protein Complexes Bind Motifs Enriched in the Proximal Region of Late Pollen-Specific Arabidopsis Promoters Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 447 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Li, X. Duan, H. Jiang, Y. Sun, Y. Tang, Z. Yuan, J. Guo, W. Liang, L. Chen, J. Yin, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of Basic/Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Family in Rice and Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2006; 141(4): 1167 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. ZHAO, G. WANG, J. ZHANG, J. YANG, S. PENG, L. GAO, C. LI, J. HU, D. LI, and L. GAO Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) and Phylogenetic Analysis of Floral Genes from a Paleoherb Species, Asarum caudigerum Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 157 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nei Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2318 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. BISHOPRIC Evolution of the Heart from Bacteria to Man Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2005; 1047(1): 13 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Zahn, J. Leebens-Mack, C. W. dePamphilis, H. Ma, and G. Theissen To B or Not to B a Flower: The Role of DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA Orthologs in the Evolution of the Angiosperms J. Hered., May 1, 2005; 96(3): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Zahn, H. Kong, J. H. Leebens-Mack, S. Kim, P. S. Soltis, L. L. Landherr, D. E. Soltis, C. W. dePamphilis, and H. Ma The Evolution of the SEPALLATA Subfamily of MADS-Box Genes: A Preangiosperm Origin With Multiple Duplications Throughout Angiosperm History Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2209 - 2223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tanabe, M. Hasebe, H. Sekimoto, T. Nishiyama, M. Kitani, K. Henschel, T. Munster, G. Theissen, H. Nozaki, and M. Ito Characterization of MADS-box genes in charophycean green algae and its implication for the evolution of MADS-box genes PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2436 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nam, K. Kaufmann, Gün. Theißen, and M. Nei A simple method for predicting the functional differentiation of duplicate genes and its application to MIKC-type MADS-box genes Nucleic Acids Res., January 19, 2005; 33(2): e12 - e12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, M.-J. Yoo, V. A. Albert, J. S. Farris, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis Phylogeny and diversification of B-function MADS-box genes in angiosperms: evolutionary and functional implications of a 260-million-year-old duplication Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 2102 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Guillet-Claude, N. Isabel, B. Pelgas, and J. Bousquet The Evolutionary Implications of knox-I Gene Duplications in Conifers: Correlated Evidence from Phylogeny, Gene Mapping, and Analysis of Functional Divergence Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2232 - 2245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Friedman, R. C. Moore, and M. D. Purugganan The evolution of plant development Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1726 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nam, J. Kim, S. Lee, G. An, H. Ma, and M. Nei Type I MADS-box genes have experienced faster birth-and-death evolution than type II MADS-box genes in angiosperms PNAS, February 17, 2004; 101(7): 1910 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||









